The universities were mentioned as were key scholars. The journals weren’t and I’m not about to publicize them. When you read articles claiming that where people sit on a bus is a reflection of sexual selection, that’s what we are criticizing.
The universities were mentioned as were key scholars. The journals weren’t and I’m not about to publicize them. When you read articles claiming that where people sit on a bus is a reflection of sexual selection, that’s what we are criticizing.
Or I'll go back to my post that Abbey first responded to. There is a continuing story about men as hunters and explorers with women as baby vessels that is reinforced by evo-psych in particular. That story provided the frame for much of anthropology (yes, even mainstream) for a long time. +
It's getting better now, and burials of, for example, high-ranking women are considered in their own light, not as subordinates to the king. But there are the pockets of male privilege, for example in the Republican party that want to believe and have others believe the Flintstones scenario.