avatar
vanagonfan @vanagonfan.bsky.social

Chorus content creators also always disclosed their association. You're not being cute.

aug 29, 2025, 8:05 pm • 1 0

Replies

avatar
am @amxxico.bsky.social

Did they? I dont think anyone had heard of chorus before this article broke. And if so, why does the contract specifically state that they cant do these things that you say they can do?

aug 29, 2025, 8:17 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
vanagonfan @vanagonfan.bsky.social

Look, you're not being cute either. The fact is, had Taylor not slandered these people, you still wouldn't have known their names. As for the content creators, the posts where they announced their collaboration with Chorus are there. You can do what Taylor didn't bother to do and find them.

aug 29, 2025, 8:19 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
vanagonfan @vanagonfan.bsky.social

Those content creators were never barred from criticizing the Dems. That's one of Taylor's own fabrications. Their content did not change in any way from pre to post-Chorus. That's the objective truth on the ground.

aug 29, 2025, 8:20 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
am @amxxico.bsky.social

Their content hasn't changed *yet, just because things are one way now, doesnt mean it will always be. You have to go back to the contract. Just because people say, this isn't enforced now, doesnt mean that will always be the case. The contract is the reality.

aug 29, 2025, 8:25 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
am @amxxico.bsky.social

If she is slandered these people why haven't they asked for a retraction? Nothing in the Wired article is incorrect. It was approved by their editorial board and authorized by the lawyers. Just because some people disclosed it doesnt mean they all did. And again it's all in the contract.

aug 29, 2025, 8:22 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
vanagonfan @vanagonfan.bsky.social

Sorry, again. You're not being cute. They all are disclosing these things you insist are in breach of some contract Taylor can't read. All of them. Go look for yourself. I mean, the fact that they *all* came out against these allegations must mean that maybe Taylor is a liar!

aug 29, 2025, 8:27 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
vanagonfan @vanagonfan.bsky.social

Unless you're convinced they're somehow all voiding their contracts in unison over nothing

aug 29, 2025, 8:27 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Fey (they/them) @varric-fan69.bsky.social

Why aren’t they suing wired?

aug 29, 2025, 8:32 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
vanagonfan @vanagonfan.bsky.social

I don't know, Fey. Do you like, hound all victims of wrongdoings by bigger personalities, or just small leftist creators?

aug 29, 2025, 8:36 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
vanagonfan @vanagonfan.bsky.social

Why isn't Taylor backing down from the obvious lies? Like the lie that Chorus collaborators never disclosed their collaboration? Because they did! Or the lie that they never criticize the Dems? What about that Fey?

aug 29, 2025, 8:37 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Fey (they/them) @varric-fan69.bsky.social

Sources?

aug 29, 2025, 8:38 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
vanagonfan @vanagonfan.bsky.social

If this one doesn't suffice, look up other people that collaborated with Chorus. They're out there, and you're a fucking adult Fey, for Christ's almighty sake.

Video thumbnail
aug 29, 2025, 8:43 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
am @amxxico.bsky.social

The breach does not matter if the provision of the contract is not excersized. In this case, not excersizing the provision *helps* chorus. And Taylor did read the whole contract and so dide the Wired editorial board and legal counsel. And of course they have a unified message, they work together!

aug 29, 2025, 8:35 pm • 2 0 • view