oh no, a cautious president! we can’t have a president who acts with due consideration with the consequences of his choices, that would render the government inoperable!
Replies
That would reduce him from an energetic sovereign to a mere chief magistrate
mar 18, 2025, 7:12 pm • 114 2 • view
and as we all know, the framers absolutely did NOT want a mere chief magistrate [puts finger to ear] i'm getting some interesting reports...
mar 18, 2025, 7:29 pm • 177 6 • view
This thread of sarcasm brings a wry smile to my face.
mar 18, 2025, 10:09 pm • 4 0 • view
……….but there were *emails*
mar 18, 2025, 7:57 pm • 56 0 • view
As we saw so clearly with... all of the previous Presidents.
mar 19, 2025, 12:31 am • 0 0 • view
Inconceivable.
mar 18, 2025, 6:49 pm • 11 0 • view
mar 18, 2025, 7:14 pm • 4 0 • view
I reckon it's still McConnell who did the most damage, but Roberts is catching up for sure.
mar 18, 2025, 6:53 pm • 32 1 • view
Comey put some gasoline on those coals too.
mar 18, 2025, 6:54 pm • 19 0 • view
Tag team.
mar 18, 2025, 7:38 pm • 2 0 • view
Accidentally dropped the Constitution in the river for a minute and piranhas did their thing.
mar 18, 2025, 7:52 pm • 3 0 • view
As if he didn’t know trump was coming…
mar 18, 2025, 9:13 pm • 1 0 • view
mar 18, 2025, 9:14 pm • 11 0 • view
I am so smart! SMRT! www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls5B...
mar 18, 2025, 9:40 pm • 6 0 • view
we can't have a president that is afraid of what might happen if he breaks the law! how dare we think that he's accountable for any consequences of his own actions!
mar 18, 2025, 9:14 pm • 3 0 • view
>that would render the government inoperable! That's why we have Musk as co-president!
mar 18, 2025, 9:40 pm • 1 0 • view
The essential problem is that Roberts is not unique The core of the immunity opinion — a belief that the Framers would see the need to protect a “vigorous” and “energetic” Executive — has always found support within the institutionalist culture in Washington in general and at DOJ, in particular
mar 18, 2025, 6:59 pm • 3 0 • view