to cover these people as representing a specific ideological tendency with material consequences would be to risk an accusation of wokeness
to cover these people as representing a specific ideological tendency with material consequences would be to risk an accusation of wokeness
I feel like I would go a little further and say that the mainstream press has a broad reluctance to actively come to a conclusion or tell people "this specific thing is true" when they can just report the "opinions" of "important people" instead.
This kind of blends with my increasing conviction that the main thing that's going wrong with non-right-wing institutions right now is that the people with all the power are absolutely fucking terrified of taking responsibility for any outcomes.
telling people the truth would also reduce overall ad engagement impressions
It’s frightening how successful the racist faction of this country, comprised of government officials & community leaders, abetted by the media, have normalized this false & pernicious notion of “reverse racism,” somehow making the idea that white Americans, particularly men, are really the …
Persecuted group in America.
Yep. People would start accusing the media of being aware of their surroundings. We all know that’s not true.
I'm not watching that clip, but do they say anything at all about rightwing religion?
it is better to be woke then asleep they can go get fucked
Agreed. But also because the right-wing’s beliefs are genuinely insane. Anyone explaining these views out of the control of our current predicament would be labeled insane- no one wants to believe they actually believe this crap.
Besides, how do you explain thug rule as an ideology?
damn, man, that is such a righteous application of sarcasm please keep on making your eloquent complaints
I wonder if it’s bc they are afraid of completing the syllogism: these folks are white nationalists, white nationalism does bad stuff, therefore these folks are bad. Weirdly it’s the last part they are so averse to, when that should be the easy part. I guess because it violates news “neutrality”
Gasp!
They don't even ask the question about why anyone thinks we need higher fertility when our regime is also trying to remove millions of people from the country (and decrease women's access to birth control and reproductive health care).
But that’s implied: we’re getting rid of the mud people; we need more good, white stock.
Because it’s all about creating a “white” nation here. They’re afraid of being a minority. And your job as a woman in this context is to look pretty, take care of your man, and keep your many children quiet. Women who support this world view baffle me.
There are millions of women who aren't feminist. Religion is a big factor, as well as lack of education.
Oh I get that. Still, why would you want that? This is the question of every woman I know who left religious, agrarian societies.
They have been raised to believe that's the natural way of things - the way God wants their life to be.
Yeah. I know.
If you call bad things bad, the people who like bad things get upset. If you call good things not so good, who cares what the people who like good things think, you're being edgy and provocative.
The implicit assumption of MSM is that the general reader is white. They don't want to risk "accusing" their reader of racism. I teach college writing and argument. My students of color already know this but for many white students, this is new and useful information
I hear Will Ferrell’s character Mugatu saying , “ooh cults are so hot right now..”
I would offer that part of the problem is the US has a deeply Calvinist sensibility in its cultural DNA; everything is about your personal relationship with God (or ethics in this case) which means that racism can only be a personal moral failing as opposed to a systemic problem.
and for once it would reflect appropriate usage of the word, as it would require engaging with the nature of systemic racism
The American media are afraid to point out fascism hiding out in the wholesome for fear that they themselves will be deemed unwholesome. Nevertheless, fascism always uses the most wholesome sounding slogans for the most obscene of programmes. See also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinder%...
Ironically, it’s exactly what we all need to be woke to.
So let's get down to brass tacks here: It's ok to call everything even slightly progressive "dangerous radical leftism" because the system is set up such that people in power sympathize with white supremacist fascism, is that pretty much it?
Yes, in the land of all views must be respectfully considered and covered unless they are left-wing, in which case intelligence and common sense demands hauteur and ridicule.
📌
Look at all those men speaking. One of them says,”It’s easy! Just have sex!” Um, yeah, easy. For the men.
"if it doesn't specifically inconvenience me, then it's not a problem", in fairness, is a core sociopolitical basis of our country.
But that's the attitude of, I bet, 80% of white people in the US.
Needs more woke.
Hey! Using really big words one after another like that is way woke!