once again, i'll suggest that perhaps the reason the broad public thinks democrats are weak is that when confronted with situations that demands that democrats loudly and proactively stand up for their values, democrats shirk from the fight
once again, i'll suggest that perhaps the reason the broad public thinks democrats are weak is that when confronted with situations that demands that democrats loudly and proactively stand up for their values, democrats shirk from the fight
Makes sense, but then maybe they shouldn't be in office?
The Democratic Party has long been a Trojan Horse, attracting voters with pretty speeches, all the while smothering progressive initiatives (Pelosi dismisses progressive reform as “pie in the sky”) and signing off on widening the wage/wealth gap. Americans need to primary the “moderates.”
Pelosi understands #s. If she refers to a reform as "pie in the sky" it's likely because there aren't enough votes for it. Progressives have yet to understand this. If they did, they'd work hard at ensuring Dems have a majority. One way to do this is by not undermining Dems & depressing the votes.
Dismantling the systemic privilege funnelling America’s worth into the pockets of the top 1%, will meet strong resistance. Struggle is literally THE JOB. “Moderate” elite Dems like Pelosi don’t want to derail that privilege train they’re on, so they claim that change isn’t worth a struggle.
In your world, the GOP, who always lower taxes for the rich when they have majority/power, don't exist. You'll probably continue to say "But the Dems" while the GOP dismantle democracy & cause devastation to the US/world. Loss of USAID alone might result in 14mil dead. www.bbc.com/news/article...
In your world, change is neither possible nor necessary.Your world must be one of privilege for you to be so willing to to see America go on forever like this — Americans the toy being punted back and forth between two fat parties of robber barrons. Demand change in the Dem Party. Flex some muscle
I vote with Black women. Civil rights & voting rights are my issues. Blood was shed to gain those rights. Privilege is not being able to differentiate actual threat from perceived threat. Privilege is to throw away hard won change & ignore consequences & the people most affected by them.
Until every vote, for any party, wins equal representation in Congress our votes are an illusion, used by the plutocrats to keep us compliant. The system you seem to want to defend LED US HERE. It doesn’t have to be like this. We can demand change. It starts with #Proportional_Representation
Some people live in the here and now, and the choices available in the here and now. If you think 2024 votes were an illusion, then which alternative reality do you live in that insulates you from reality and its consequences?
If you are content with with how things have turned out with the system as it is, then by all means carry on with the limited choices they’ve put on your plate.
Many successful democracies around the world use Proportional Representation elections: Everyone represented by the party of their choice, no vote splitting, no gerrymandering, no governing without at least 50% of the voters supporting. It statistically gives better voter turnout, higher approval
Yeah if politicians thought like this in the 60s, we’d still have segregated bathrooms. If only people like Pelosi had any interest in using their massive platform and power to influence public opinion. But no, they’re feckless weaklings who can only point at a chart and say “not now”
Holding the people you elected accountable to actually do their fucking jobs is not undermining Dems. That’s not how democracy is supposed to work
Holding Dems accountable without understanding how Congress works? Demanding Dems do something that voters didn't empower them to do? Voters gave Trump/GOP power. That's the consequence of people not voting for Dems. GOP voter suppression & voter *depression* (trashing Dems) empowers the GOP.
Yeah I’m not talking about right now. I’m talking about the years of Dem majorities when things like green new deal, Medicare for all, or even something as simple and obvious as increasing the min wage were pie in the sky for people like Pelosi
And if Dems had done a better job of actually delivering the reforms they pretended to care about, maybe we wouldn’t have Trump and the GOP in power (that, and having a pudding brained geriatric insist on running again when he was clearly mentally and physically unfit)
You can’t spend decades telling people we cant do things and then keep expecting them to pull the lever. Especially when the GOP seems to have no problem doing the things they say they’re going to do
I know they think voters are stupid, but even the stupidest voters can realize that establishment Dems only care about the wealthy and corporate donors
*Informed* voters of our two-party system understand which party passes legislation to help people & which party is intentionally cruel & corrupt. Uninformed voters mindlessly regurgitate words & propaganda. Quiz: Which party reduced child poverty in half through the American Rescue Plan?
This!
and the only person willing to stand up and confront situations head on has been Gavin who is anointed by the party but nobody likes, he’s gross to trans people and experiencing homelessness. they actively sabotage any candidate that would be good for them, Dems are weak cowards.
The only way for everybody to get used to Democrats being fierce loud fighters, is for the Democrats to start being fierce loud fighters. I'm constantly surprised at protesters feeling like they must be polite -- I grew up in the 70s and those protests were loud and sweaty and rude. And effective.
Just the ones who take AIPAC $
Is the survival of representative self government and the rule of law in the US a 'kitchen table issue?'
Perhaps the reason they do that is because they’re weak and insincere?
How much of it is that they AREN'T saying things and more that the things that they are saying are just not being reported at all? Given legacy media buried a multi million, full 50 state protest without even doing a footnote level acknowledgement it's kinda hard to act like info is fair and free
It's 'cause they're capitalists first and public servants last
So, the reason folks think that Democrats are weak, is because they are weak?
perhaps because we are led by a coward and a instrument of the zionists. Just speculation, but….
I read in a 35 year old Dave Barry book that Democrats are the type of people who would stop to help you change your flat tire but would somehow set your car on fire in the process. Halcyon days, it turns out
This is what people are responding to in Zohran; he actually believes in his policies and so is able to argue for them effectively. He can also link them to specifics, like in the video of him talking about how curb cuts could be improved by filling open staff lines.
This is, of course, because they're paid by the same donors who benefit from the current situation, and have been told that if they actually put up a fight, they'll immediately turn off the money faucet.
Part of the reason they're weak is that they have a weak hand. Newsom objective to the deployment of the CA national guard, vocally, loudly, and through the legal process. Yet it didn't stop anything. I agree that should be loud against it, but if they're steamrolled, what's the point?
Their donors must be telling them not to overreact. As if they've arrived anywhere near 'react' levels at this point. Gutless, feckless wonders. I've had it.
Just don’t understand why “not only that, he did this too!” wouldn’t work since that what the DoI is
one thing i'm fascinated by is how these "tested" messages do not actually have any relationship to how people encounter political messaging these days.
So we have real life confirmation of voter activation/participation with Mamdani messaging that completely contradicts the theoretical model that’s failing. And yet you can’t challenge the Democrat leadership that they know better 🤔
The message is testing poorly because the message is a bummer, not because the message is wrong or unpersuasive.
Sunk costs. Not willing to write off they spend money on idiots as it may make them look like an idiot. Unfortunately for them, it makes them look like more of an idiot but sticking with it versus cutting loses and perhaps increasing their support.
All of these messages are way too long to meaningfully test. Its weird to test these and not slogans or general themes
The problem isn't "tested messages" as such (unless you actually think Newsom's messages haven't been tested). It's matching the messages with people with the right acting skills to get the messages to hit home. "Authenticity" is a matter of the messenger having the right acting chops.
Also, a bunch of them are substantially the same but test at completely different levels. The methodology must be incredibly stupid.
Yep, the methodology looks really bad, like they jammed in what they wanted to talk about no matter what. bsky.app/profile/whst...
fwiw it's not hard to craft a line that nods to kitchen table issues but still captures some urgency. "you put this asshole in office to make your life easier but all he's done is cut taxes for his rich buddies, kidnapped your neighbors and sent the military to tell you to shut up when you complain"
📌
Keep it simple
Freaking Gavin Newsom and all of his baggage is resonating because there is an appetite for someone, ANYONE, to message like that and fight back! Imagine if a politician that didn't toss Trans people to the wolves did this!
Easy peasy.
Canceling cancer research…who asked for that?
hear, hear
100%
These losers all seem to have forgotten that the last Democratic presidential candidate to inspire actual enthusiasm (Obama) did so because of his unapologetic opposition to the Iraq war, a stance considered political suicide at the time.
* (winning Democratic candidate to inspire enthusiasm, I should say)
He then proceeded to stamp out all that enthusiasm by telling the left to fuck off
Yep. Talk like a normal person.
Dems, Dem consultants, most MSMedia--all act as if the only way for Dems to win is to follow--not lead--uninformed/disinformed voters. Big Data surveys ask low info voters re: 100s of policies & discover they're focused on their wallets--Bc Dems & media don't inform ppl on threats to democracy.
That strategy worked great in 2024--for the GOP. MSMedia hire many RWngers to do the RW part of MSM "both sides" coverage, & hire many "centrists" who say both sides are equally bad & who practice Murc's law religiously. So media influence Dems, their donors & their consultants in a RW way.
SBF, once 1 of the biggest Dem donors-- openly gave $ to Dems but gave equal amts of dark $ to GOP. So he was not a Dem ally. How many other Dem donors do that? Does it influence their advice?--in such a way that they advise Dems in ways that help the GOP? www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
In even mainstream media, in the economy & in other ways, we are immersed in Right Wing views. So it's natural that Dems, Dem consultants, Dem donors, Dem Big Data surveyors etc. are all believing in & acting on RWng disinfo. But somehow we all need to get past this, if democracy is to survive.
Interesting point!
Thanks, Blanche
"We're all adults here, we can all agree that all people want the same things for their family, even if their family looks a little different from yours. They want to put healthy food on the table, to send their kids to good schools, and to know their kids will be safe when they leave the house.
Right now, this admin is making grocery prices rise & products are disappearing from the shelves. They're taking parents away from kids and making people feel afraid to walk down the street. They're so sensitive, they're even getting comedians cancelled! Is this really what you voted for?" etc
Put it on a billboard. Meeting adjourned.
I’m in the way back in California. People here don’t see these issues as substantive. They buy into the old Conservative Party line and still blame Dems for anything that goes wrong from prices to wolves. I’ve had better arguments with mules.
Maybe we just need to send dem leaders to improv school to learn “yes AND”
Exactly - it’s not “tariffs are bad economic policy.” It’s “Trump promised to lower prices. He lied and now everything costs more.” Perhaps more importantly, no one should listen to the guy who spent a billion dollars and lost to Donald Trump.
That works.
And they show disdain for anyone who does exactly that.
💥
cussing makes the Baileys sad
he literally prefers the imaginary constituents in his head to his actual human voters
The rich buddies one won’t work on bros: they think they’ll be the next rich buddy
not to mention how weird they all are. that is still a valid talking point.
“The guy cutting funding from cancer research is spending untold billions to send the military to American cities to round up Uber eats drivers.”
Like, how is a police state not a fucking "kitchen table issue."
Also like "vote for me I'll get end the military harassing your kids" is a pretty kitchen table issue!
Even if the “kitchen table issue” advice were true it will always fail as it cannot keep and retain attention unless yolked to more sensational news. A huge problem we have is that “the tax systems unfair” cannot compete with “dangerous foreigners” and “sexual deviants” for short attention spans.
You gotta hammer on the individual cases and put a face to it if you want people to remember the systemic critique (Pedocon theory!). It might feel grubby but you can’t throw mud without getting some on your hands.
I’d even say that the ICE bs is a kitchen table issue - grocery prices are only starting to show the tariff impacts, restaurants have seen a decline, foreign tourism is down. None of this is good for us.
The problem is conservatives have a stranglehold on new and traditional media. How then do you get the message out?
And yer grocery bill....
Maybe they should actually come talk to some of us. How many Town Halls are they holding these days?
They don't care, most of the poorest states are red states and they constantly vote in Republican super majorities at the state level.
I think this is a great example of a common sense approach to messaging using colloquial conversational language that while not focused on core left talking points does not betray them either but is clear and unequivocating.
To this very point 👆, last week @mayorwu.boston.gov of Boston responded defiantly to AG Bondi’s threat to withdraw Federal funding unless he city cooperated with ICE. The focus was on the issue at hand, but she deftly wove in the kitchen table issues into her remarks without losing a beat. ☑️ it out.
Aces!
Yes, they’re missing the point about the power of anger and emotion in messaging
+1. Would submit that rather than highlight the Trump-voter’s, eh, poor-decision making, perhaps more effective to note that “…you trusted this person and he has betrayed your trust; all he’s done …” Realize we’re spitballing on this Sky thing. But such a nuance has been helpful in my conversation.
Yes. Walk & chew gum at the same time. It can be done. "Trump will kick your grandma out of elder care in order to pay for thugs to roam the streets and snatch your daughter in broad daylight."
Sometimes I wonder if Dems aren’t being threatened as much as Republicans claim they are being threatened by the MAGA base.
THIIIIIIIIS
Don’t forget to throw in some shade for Republicans, who are continuing to support this rapist felon who thinks he’s a king when he should be a public servant
And the DC hospitality industry is seeing COVID levels of business
Also, the military deployments and immigration raids are having a marked effect on local economies (on top of the general damage he's doing at a national level), so it's not like they're completely separate things. Effective messaging should be able to tie it all together.
More broadly you could just ask who exactly is paying the tab for all this deployment...and maybe get people thinking about the fact that it's gonna be them and it's not gonna be cheap....
Yessssss
Okay but the urge to “craft” messages that do bankshot stuff like this is the root of a lot of the Democratic message terribleness. Just say what you think! Threading the needle between six different issues is performance art, not persuasion
I would love it if my local rep would inflect that he cared, at all But I’m going to wind up driving through a checkpoint on my way to work and sheltering my undocumented students in the book closet before they ever happens
right, i mean, if you asked me what i thought on the spot, i might say something like this. it is actually rhetorically effective to contrast what someone says they do with what they're actually doing.
right, I think the distinction here is contrasting for the sake of dunking and demonstrating contempt vs contrasting for the sake of working in some consultant-approved keywords to boost your keyword score
Which is, I think, the bigger issue with the candidates we see put forth: so many of them *require* crafted lines because they’re incapable of saying what they think in the moment (or worse, that they don’t believe what should be said). That should be disqualifying at this point.
It’s the latter. They don’t have any convictions. They are empty vessels the consultants fill with messaging.
Zohran did a charming little video about how his comms team told him he was using the word "ultimately" too much (cute supercut of same), then "I am listening, I am learning" (cut to interview where he catches himself at "ul-" and changes word). It killed me. I died. I'm still crying.
These people have the most gifted, natural communicator in a generation. A man incredible at being natural and human and connecting with who he's talking to... and they're trying to make him nitpick his words while speaking. If anyone can put me in touch with this comms team. I just wanna talk.
Old Dems still want their candidates to be nice to billionaires and corporations, while pandering to workers, which reads as increasingly contradictory and delusional.
omg you nailed it! if i see chuck schumer hunched over a lectern reading from a piece of paper *1 more time* ....😡 if he can't just stand up and say what's on his mind, i have to wonder if he's still even GOT a mind
Absolutely! The answers should be automatic because they believe in those values to their marrow. The answers should be scathing because to even suggest those values aren't worth it is offensive to the soul. The answers should be authentic because those values ARE authentic.
Their marrow is donor dollars
No shame in training and rehearsing. Like playing music. Not everyone is a spontaneous genius. But like music, you practice not until you *can* do it right but until you *will* do it right.
You are talking about performance. Acting. What people trust in political terms is some level of authenticity. Too many Dems these days are media trained by people who are out of touch with real life & real emotional responses. People who think that somebody badly beaten by ICE is a “distraction”.
Good points, still think a bit of coaching and practice could help a number of Ds connect better, but JMO. Great point about ICE hurting people. WAY more than a “distraction”!
Given the truly outrageous things we are seeing unfold, checking with a political consultant before responding shouldn’t be anyone’s first move. Pretending like it’s “all cool” is also mind-blowingly stupid. In a house fire to say get out! In a dem house fire they say relax no prob. No bueno.
Again, this is being authentic. "It's who I am" Practice what you preach. No paladin is born. I thought along these lines soon after I punched reply. I think I understand what you're saying, and I believe might even be a facet of what the problem is.
The befuddlement one must feel when confronted with a Crowder "Change My Mind" is unexpected. But that is the lay of the ground now. Until it evolves again the unpracticed must sit, the unready stand aside, the unwilling go home. And when they aren't needed, they too will be replaced. An opinion.
I think Jeffries needs training. He has potential but sweet mother of pearl he makes a hash of things
I can't say specifics, I don't "know" the man. But I think you mean rhetorical training? Everybody could use that. Especially in the face of the rambling barrage from 1600. What little I got was in boot camp. A torrent spat in your face that made no sense but you must push through.
Some Dems don’t like Jeffries, but I don’t have the issues with him as much as I do with the party. The Dems don’t use him enough to promote their agenda.
How do you do fellow human
Can you imagine how people in L.A. and D.C. feel about their terror and anger at being invaded is considered a "distraction" by the Dem leadership. Why not just flip them the Bird Hakeem and tell them to STFU.
How can they not see that taken as a whole those messages << the sum of the parts? However persuasive any one statement may be, the people following these analytics and delivering them in sequence look like unprincipled, pandering losers who have no core. Everyone sees right through them.
IMO it’s mostly just a matter of firepower. You don’t need to obsess over the perfectly crafted message if you have blanketed all channels of mass communication with a constant stream of propaganda. You can’t break through that brain infection with a single, well-crafted message.
"they're all freaks" works well with a quick reminder "and we are not"
The worst thing about this memo? The messages they disfavor are as rhetorically INeffective as possible, meandering mishmash, while kitchen table shit is written crisply and urgently. Blue Rose does this all the time (they butchered one of @anatosaurus.bsky.social 's messages). It's atrocious.
The biggest problem was Biden never got out and spoke and Kamala only got like 3 weeks time to get it out.
And she wasn't allowed to say anything against Joe or his policies.
This. The gap between the rhetoric and the reality is so enormous. The messaging should start there. Even before you get into how awful the reality is.
Showing a little passion helps, as well. There’s no fire in that message.
Am I missing something? "The higher the percentile, the more effective that talking point is at driving down Donald Trump's disapproval"? Democrats don't want Trump's DISapproval to go DOWN? (Are they inverting the scale on that Republican page?)
We might have to grapple with the possibility that many career politicians don’t have independent thoughts at all.
A lot of them actually are that politician from Parks and Rec who just kinda sits there when he’s not gladhanding with voters
Ok but Sen. Van Hollen’s hair on fire, “this is a dictatorial power grab” message got a rousing 13%! When Dems go alone on this messaging, MSM gleefully boffsides it and gets to say “extremists in both parties!” Ppl forget that GOP has had Fox providing air cover for their assaults for 30 years!
I mean, this is today! A leading MSM outlet basically signaling that there is no reason to panic, it’s all just optics:
Well said. Sincerity resonates. “Messaging” needs work, but this seems way too fancy
Asking your neighbors questions is a lost art. That’s how we learn and that’s how we can be responsive. All the dems in our town are not like me. But being honest, listening, and developing trust outside the election cycle is key. Ask me how I know.
also, even mid messaging and priorities could go a lot farther if literally any elected Dem other than newsom was capable of repeating the same thing a dozen times per day
Yeah, Zohran makes this kind of argument (“Trump appealed to people based on their material needs and then delivered authoritarianism and corruption that helped the wealthy while betraying his voters”) and I think it works because he genuinely believes it. He’s not just trying to triangulate.
There are unique elements of Trump that often get papered over, but the issue with deliverism or rather Shorism is that it tends to be overly reductive and premised on the idea you can only succeed if you silo away any hard issue. That's just not true. You can play these issues off each other.
“Not saying he’s being a fascist asshole and punishing places that didn’t vote for him ONLY because he’s all over the Epstein files and inflation is through the roof, but he definitely wants all that off the front page”
I’m absolutely fine with someone comparing prices now to when he took office, but using the guard as his own personal army because he can’t handle mockery has to be the main thing and Epstein a close second.
The David Shor memo goes in the “Democrats can’t win” file.
Was talking with a dog playdate buddy here in suburban NC, and he's doing a lot of traveling to see places before Trump initiates martial law, and is crossing places off his list he thinks he can't get to first. Fascism *is* a kitchen table issue. Normal people have to account for it.
I feel like getting jackboots off the streets would be intensely motivating for voters
because the "tested" messages come from the D versions of Frank Luntz, and they don't ask the questions the D on the street (citizen on the street) wants them to ask and answer.
Maybe they need to test messaging on the Epstein files
It seems like democrats are always shooting for incremental changes. The trick is finding a good way to sell a plan for greater economic and personal security. That's FDR 2.0 at least.
"Kitchen table issues" is tired and corny. Any politician who starts spouting that term is telling me they don't know anything about how people really live. It shows me that they'd rather spend money to hire cynical, greedy, jackoffs like Third Way and Blue Rose than talk to people themselves.
Are they actually polling real people or just using AI?
These tested messages poll super great with the donor class.
Tbh, in the few Republican town hall episodes I've seen, kitchen table issues seem to be the vast majority of rage focus.
Dem messaging would improve 1000% if David Shor decided to one day just walk into traffic.
Also these tested messages have seemingly not worked for a literal decade. If they did, wouldn't Clinton & Harris have won?
Really, anyone involved in the 2024 campaign that managed to engineer defeat against Trump's chaotic ramble of a campaign should *never* be allowed anywhere near campaign management again. (Walz is excused. He was doing well till he was gagged.)
And notably, the ones they tested them against are also wishy-washy consultant speak (“a manufactured DC crime crisis” and “an imposition on DC home rule”) instead of “Stephen Miller’s jackbooted thugs are coming to your neighborhood”.
Yes. I would be out there telling people that the jackbooted thugs are coming to your city next and they are going to arrest you if you so much as look at them the wrong way. In this case, fear is the correct response.
Ds need a Newt/Luntz team who in the 1990s sent training tapes to R politicians teaching them to speak about Ds in demeaning and derogatory language. Luntz helped craft many of Rs lines. Eliminate estate taxes becomes ‘eliminate death taxes’; the PP&ACA becomes ‘Government takeover of healthcare’.
Public opinion polling stopped being accurate (if it ever was) when the landline became extinct. A snapshot of weirdos today.
Frankly I'm just tired of these incessantly wrong people keeping their highly paid jobs as consultants. Give me new bad ideas, at least
I think the consultant is just telling leadership what they want to hear. They've worked so long for their turn to get their positions in the party, they don't want to have to do anything new, no matter what.
“tell the client that the correct choice is whatever they wanted to do already” is the basic consultancy ethos
“after our rigorous analysis, we’ve determined that the proper plan for your business is to fire your employees and give yourself a bonus”
The fossil establishment, "centrist" Dems will always cater to the people who will never vote for them - this is just more of that - thinking it will make MAGA & repugs vote Dem. They sideline people like David Hogg etc & need to be ousted. Vote in primaries people!!!!!!
Apparently, popularism assumes that fascism is a lot more popular.
Dem leadership hearing from their consultants that being the first to promote turning the deportation camps into death camps might just be the winning strategy. Schumer and Jeffries call for a new round of surveys.
Pathetically shirk!
Democrats introduce bill to stop Trump's D.C. police takeover share.google/IQQFPJaC32kY...
They know it will never pass. More performative than action. Do something that makes a difference!
And yet look what happened. Trump administration partially retreats, agrees to leave DC police chief in charge | PBS News share.google/sIhjfcWWkLVK...
Love the headline! It implies they had a choice, like the judge issued a suggestion. FFS, we’re fucked.
So if all the Democrats did was stand in front of a microphone every day yelling you would believe they were doing enough to fight for our democracy?
Everything is a distraction to them. The amount of energy they spend trying NOT to talk about anything is truly wild.
Well, sure. But they do it Every. Single. Time. Does consistency count for nothing?
If they don't stand up for their values, can they be said to have those values?
Led by @schumer.senate.gov and weak-ass @hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social .
we shouldn’t have to have huge knock down, drag out political fights in the course of normal, everyday governance. also once dems get elected they apparently lose their will to fight for anything except reelection.
And what Democrats outside of those two states actually care about what is going on there vs the issues that directly impact their lives, Jamelle.. Wish they would but NOT what I am seeing or hearing…🤷♀️
Only a small minority of elected Democrats are taking any actions to stop Trump’s authoritarian coup no matter how unpopular it is.
Maybe the Dems just don’t have values anymore after selling their souls to corporate interests for so many decades. We’re asking them to be people they just aren’t.
Primary all of them
The present leadership has neither the skills nor the grit to fight for America. Their goals are to get re-elected and raise money. They'll be happy to serve Nazi masters no matter how despised they are by their oppressors.
Democrats lack the megaphones that the GOP supports have created. They also created units to connect people of like challenges and beliefs. Organizers go to the old fundraisers straight away without creating infrastructure. Dems lack a Hispanic team, a farm team, etc. We all get the emails for money
Having the stomach to swiftly hold Trump accountable for trying to overthrow the election was the litmus test. You don't do it, the coup attempter is by rule stronger than you.
Wrong! It’s AOC, Bernie and Zohran! The Dems fighting Trump are dragging down the DNC’s poll numbers with voters who want to see somebody fighting on their behalf! Axios.
I know that's what I've had problems with! Every time I see or get messages from the national party I tell them to fire all their strategists and talk with the people. What a novel concept! Thanks for this example!
So the reason people think they are weak is because they are not strong.
It’s like they think appeasement will eventually leads to getting back to 1995 era politics. They don’t get that we are way past that point since that escalator speech. The base is hungry for a leader that doesn’t give a damn about the press and the outlook. Go down fighting.
We can talk about both and at the same time. The leader we deserve has not emerged yet and hopefully soon. I need someone to yell and call the president an idiot bc he is, norms be damned. Call out the press for their weakness.
Many of top Democrats’ donors are the same as Republican donors. You can see how timid they are acting right now. They don’t want to anger their masters/donors @hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social @schumer.senate.gov @repdangoldman.bsky.social
Look. A decorated war hero who couldn't even remotely fight off the Swift boat attacks sure helped with the idea that dems can't fight. I was there. I'm a vet. I was shocked at how poorly he handled the situation. Sure, he got my vote, but ...
It’s the turtle strategy. Pull your head inside your shell and wait for the bad thing to go away. Tough break for the folks counting on you to protect them from the bad thing. But you can’t hear them from inside your shell anyway. Leadership! Poll tested—consultant approved.
Maybe avoid the words “distraction” and “distracting” and “distract.”
Not only that, but they actively try to sideline and undermine anyone who tries to fight
Someboy told me this just yesterday. For years she didn't say that she was a Democrat because she viewed them as weak, then she began identifying as a Democrat for a long time, but now they're proving that they are actually weak and she was right to be embarrassed by them all those years.
The DNC leadership battle wail: "Don't make me do stuff!"
I would say the old status regime shirk from it while the new generation is ready to fight
Yes, but they don't know how because after the 70s the conservatives tricked everyone into believing that disagreement was impolite and unacceptable. My kids were SHOCKED when I explained 60s and 70s civil disobedience actions to them.
THIS! All we have are George McFlys. We need Marty McFlys.
Related: where are Schumer and Jeffries?
People are loving Newsom right now simply bc he is bringing the fight to the enemy. Gavin. Fucking. Newsom.
I used this phrase on a group of four people today, one being a Republican......."WE DESERVE BETTER" . I think I've found the catch word/phrase that suits my style of political speak. I can use it in both high and low situations. ✌🏼 📢🆘🆘🆘🆘🆘🆘🆘🇺🇸
What's the tipping point when people say fuck em all and start going after all these people?