avatar
David Dayen @ddayen.bsky.social

Rhode Island passed a law banning mandatory anti-union employee meetings. Union-busting law firm Littler Mendelson held a webinar for employers about the law. And they essentially told employers... to break the law! We got the transcript and the PowerPoint: prospect.org/justice/2025...

sep 1, 2025, 1:24 pm • 210 88

Replies

avatar
chelittle.bsky.social @chelittle.bsky.social

Well that's a lawsuit that the state has against that law firm

sep 1, 2025, 6:32 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
tsonic45.bsky.social @tsonic45.bsky.social

Lawyers, yeah the House and Senate are full of them. That's why nothing good ever gets done. They are too busy lining their own pockets.

sep 1, 2025, 1:58 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
David Dayen @ddayen.bsky.social

“We are not in the habit of advising you lightly that you should challenge laws,” one lawyer said on the webinar. But “if you are a bit more risk tolerant, and you want to continue” holding anti-union meetings, “that is a choice that you can make.” prospect.org/justice/2025...

But Tumolo jumped in at the end with one more slide, advising employers to think about holding mandatory meetings anyway. “Note that mandatory meetings have tremendous value,” Tumolo said on the webinar. “Historically these meetings have been found to be lawful… we’ve talked about the serious constitutional problems that these laws have.” The PowerPoint goes further, asserting that the Rhode Island law is “facially unconstitutional” and “likely preempted by federal law.” Both Tumolo and Folger-Hartwell acknowledged that it would be time-consuming and expensive to challenge the law, especially with the current uncertain situation at the NLRB. But Crowley believes that getting companies interested in violating the law was the point. “They’re trying to find a client to make a case at the Supreme Court,” he said.
sep 1, 2025, 1:29 pm • 43 8 • view
avatar
David Dayen @ddayen.bsky.social

Stay to the end when these union-busting lawyers try to play it cool fielding questions from the union members who stormed the call. prospect.org/justice/2025...

The end of the presentation offered some comic relief. The three dozen union members who signed up for the webinar left questions before being ushered off the call, which ranged from “How do you possibly sleep at night?” to “What type of terrible parent did you have in order to take employee rights away?” Folger-Hartwell and Tumolo both replied that they sleep “very well” and “soundly,” and reiterated their belief that they work hard for their clients to preserve their employer speech rights. “Lastly,” Folger-Hartwell said, “We got some nice, not questions necessarily, but really friendly and supportive comments like, ‘You corporate, fascist pieces of trash’ and that kind of thing. And it was intended as insulting but I take advising employers as a compliment.”
sep 1, 2025, 1:31 pm • 50 13 • view
avatar
Samuel Durso @samueldurso.bsky.social

Mr Jeffries & Mr Schumer: it's a class war on Labor Day. Maybe now is the time for something stronger than Hallmark greetings.

sep 1, 2025, 3:14 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
En Buen Ora @enbuenora.bsky.social

'I take being a fascist piece of trash as a point of pride' he wanted to say

sep 1, 2025, 1:32 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Brett "Solidarity 2025" Banditelli @banditelli.org

Soulless ghouls

sep 1, 2025, 1:34 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Its Wit A K @itswitak.bsky.social

Shouldn't these lawyers be brought before their state's bar for discipline?

sep 1, 2025, 6:17 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Paul Alan Levy @paulalanlevy.bsky.social

preemption, preemption! preemption, preemption!

sep 1, 2025, 5:43 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Colin in Edinburgh @colinedinburgh.bsky.social

medium.com/@colingajews...

sep 1, 2025, 3:04 pm • 0 0 • view