Expect, no. But if the only choices on the ballot are A, whose party guarantees slavery or B, who personally endorses enslavement but whose party is mostly opposed and doesn't grant absolute power, then B is the better choice. Waiting for the perfect B only lets the A's keep running things.
I'm not going to vote for you to kill me. It's never going to fucking happen. If you want to vote to support my death, I'm never, ever going to help you do that. bsky.app/profile/lumi...
bsky.app/profile/shel...
If he is an ass he will choose the biggest impact. If he is an elephant, he can stop the trolley before someone gets hurt. The first sentence is not right if you mean ass is an animal.
I'm German, so forgive my ignorance for not knowing that. 😁 Now I know and I have to think again about it.
This has been the strategy for decades. Don‘t you see where it lead to? How about we don’t. Democrats are incredibly unpopular right now for a reason. We need to do something new. Try a different approach. It’s not about looking for perfection, we need actual change! Not the status quo.
wow, liberals are really proving the whole “scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds” thing in real time. maybe, just maybe, there should be a strong firm line in the sand against fucking SLAVERY. no amount is acceptable. do you hear the words you’re speaking?
They're making it sound like "not supporting slavery" is such a high bar that it's ridiculous to expect a candidate to clear it.
right? like i feel like i’m going fucking insane talking to these people, their souls are rotten to their very core and i genuinely don’t know what you do with people who don’t get why slavery was and is so indescribably horrific
Are you saying only "perfect" people are capable of seeing trans people as deserving of rights?
Ok how about three years before B is the only option we talk about having other options
How about just NOT ALLOWING B TO BE THE OPTION.
There's a secret third option that you seem to be forgetting about
there are 3 years to find a new candidate you fucking dumbfuck
Of course I oppose slavery and support trans rights. I bet we vote very similarly. I wish we had more perfect candidates, too. I vote for best available. If it ends up Newsom vs Trump, I'd have no problem figuring out which candidate *and party* most threaten the people and issues I care about.
How about using the ample time between now and the next election to find someone who says slavery is bad?
Then B pushes the party to Grant enslavement with a slightly nicer face
No, if slavery is on the ballot the moral option is to take the John Brown approach.
You really thought you cooked here, that's the sad part, lolololololol
She was already correct you didn’t need to prove her point.
actually the correct answer is C not a democracy
Don't you get it? It's still a "democracy" for MARCUS, and that's what *really* matters here. That Marcus can go about his day to day life, secure in the knowledge that his own schedule, his own *life*, won't be disrupted. The way these people are showing their whole asses is just delicious.
Harris was the best candidate for centrists who wanted to vote for a Republican without actually marking it on the ballot. If anyone actively & sincerely opposed Trump’s policies & ideals, they would never vote for anyone whose Venn diagram overlapped with his.
The lesser evil is still evil, which explains why we slid into deeper fascism over the decades. We will never vote our way out of fascism when “less evil than the other candidate” is the only option.
we already have legalized slavery that is weaponized against minorities in this country and here you are arguing for normalizing the chattel kind
