avatar
Pavel @spavel.bsky.social

I dislike the term "individual contributor" for many reasons, but chiefly because there's already a word for "employee who isn't a manager" and it's "worker"

aug 4, 2025, 10:11 pm • 128 9

Replies

avatar
Robert Daniel Pickard @notpickard.com

i thought it was code for "we want their work output enough to bubble wrap them because don't fit in to the corporate culture"

aug 4, 2025, 10:48 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
E.Z. Hart @ezhart.com

In orgs I've been a part of, IC means "knowledge worker whose advancement track doesn't include official reports on the org chart". Some are forever leaf nodes in the org chart; others are doing more management than the managers, but between org sections because the org chart is stuck in the 90s.

aug 5, 2025, 4:33 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
E.Z. Hart @ezhart.com

It's a weird cop-out because the orgs can't quite seem to deal with aligning compensation with value rather than org chart depth.

aug 5, 2025, 4:39 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Jeremy Page @badbanjo.bsky.social

Managers work! At least good ones do.

aug 4, 2025, 10:14 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
coinDragon @coindragon.bsky.social

The bad-actor thinkers gives the entire brand a bad name 😌 Too much patriarchy, nepotism, and old imperialism in thinker role tho. Your cousin Vinny is a bad doer? Very visible and ownable Your cousin Vinny a bad thinker? Other people fuck up so Vinny gets overlooked

aug 4, 2025, 10:37 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Cris (without an H) @ambignostic.bsky.social

[Wal-Mart loudspeaker] cast member needed at checkout #3

aug 5, 2025, 4:14 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Pavel @spavel.bsky.social

the last time I cast member, they kicked me out of wizarding school

aug 5, 2025, 4:17 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Jan Maarten @janmaarten.com

pavel,

aug 6, 2025, 1:24 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Amy Hoy @amyhoy.bsky.social

i was well out of the job market when "IC" became a thing and every time i hear it, i can't believe it. that managers try to make it happen, yes that employees USE IT WILLINGLY? shocking.

aug 4, 2025, 10:33 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Revolutionary Jason @jason.revolutionarygames.co

Yeah, but that one has some history to it. Might start giving them ideas. Better to get all the IC’s thinking of themselves as part of the temporarily-embarrassed professional managerial class, no?

aug 4, 2025, 10:13 pm • 12 0 • view
avatar
Pavel @spavel.bsky.social

The "individual" is definitely doing a lot of heavy lifting to discourage notions of solidarity

aug 4, 2025, 10:14 pm • 13 0 • view
avatar
Career Quartermaster @cmiciek.bsky.social

Just remember, it's all human resources. Getting rid of personnel as the language was a coup.

aug 5, 2025, 4:45 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
John FIX YOUR HEARTS OR DIE Keynes @bnr-keynes.bsky.social

'team member' mother fucker this aint the yankees and i aint lou gehrig

aug 5, 2025, 4:13 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Chris Moody @moodycomputer.bsky.social

I tend to think of managers in most structures as part of the worker class. Maybe the IC/Manager divide is better expressed as a creator-coordinator spectrum? Both ends of which are in tension with the owners (execs, shareholders)?

aug 4, 2025, 11:02 pm • 2 0 • view