I dislike the term "individual contributor" for many reasons, but chiefly because there's already a word for "employee who isn't a manager" and it's "worker"
I dislike the term "individual contributor" for many reasons, but chiefly because there's already a word for "employee who isn't a manager" and it's "worker"
i thought it was code for "we want their work output enough to bubble wrap them because don't fit in to the corporate culture"
In orgs I've been a part of, IC means "knowledge worker whose advancement track doesn't include official reports on the org chart". Some are forever leaf nodes in the org chart; others are doing more management than the managers, but between org sections because the org chart is stuck in the 90s.
It's a weird cop-out because the orgs can't quite seem to deal with aligning compensation with value rather than org chart depth.
Managers work! At least good ones do.
The bad-actor thinkers gives the entire brand a bad name 😌 Too much patriarchy, nepotism, and old imperialism in thinker role tho. Your cousin Vinny is a bad doer? Very visible and ownable Your cousin Vinny a bad thinker? Other people fuck up so Vinny gets overlooked
[Wal-Mart loudspeaker] cast member needed at checkout #3
the last time I cast member, they kicked me out of wizarding school
pavel,
i was well out of the job market when "IC" became a thing and every time i hear it, i can't believe it. that managers try to make it happen, yes that employees USE IT WILLINGLY? shocking.
Yeah, but that one has some history to it. Might start giving them ideas. Better to get all the IC’s thinking of themselves as part of the temporarily-embarrassed professional managerial class, no?
The "individual" is definitely doing a lot of heavy lifting to discourage notions of solidarity
Just remember, it's all human resources. Getting rid of personnel as the language was a coup.
'team member' mother fucker this aint the yankees and i aint lou gehrig
I tend to think of managers in most structures as part of the worker class. Maybe the IC/Manager divide is better expressed as a creator-coordinator spectrum? Both ends of which are in tension with the owners (execs, shareholders)?