I read it and told you my interpretation which is the majority. Your opinion is the minority one. But, ok, block me if that truth bruises you.
I read it and told you my interpretation which is the majority. Your opinion is the minority one. But, ok, block me if that truth bruises you.
You did not read Citizens United. You read blurbs about Citizens United. You're dumb. Stop. Citizens United says people can spend their own money to distribute speech about politics. You disagree with this obviously good position.
Corporations are owned by people, and the people who are owners have the right to use their corporate resources to disseminate their speech.
So, let them use their shares of their profits and dividends to speak as individual people. Do not allow the company to speak as an expendable line item.
Did *you* read the case... for, you know, actual comprehension?
I'll leave you unblocked because I'm not closed-minded and would love to hear your unpopular interpretation.