Sean Duffy will build a nuclear reactor on the fuckin moon before the Epstein files are released.
Sean Duffy will build a nuclear reactor on the fuckin moon before the Epstein files are released.
We've finally figured out definitively who "whitey" is.
Breaking: Trump imposes 1,500% tariff on the Moon's nuclear energy. "Those Moon guys have ripped off America for too long."
Sean Duffy: "a 25 mile high speed train from DC to Baltimore based on currently available technology China has perfected is too hard to build." Also Sean Duffy: "me install nuclear reactor on moon!"
I see we’re already into the “Mars, bitches!” portion of the term. That was fast.
Also before he will ride the subway.
They ain't putting shit up on the Moon, after firing all the scientists and installing loyalist dumbfuqs. SpaceXwastika is just going cause a rocket launch explosion that will containment the continent with radioactive fallout.
Epstein files will be sent to moon with nuclear reactor
What could go wrong?
Guy of Gisborne asking the Sheriff of Nottingham: But why the moon cousin? Some of these are just for my own amusement...
The exploding test launches with nuclear payloads will be something
Don't nuclear reactors need water as a coolant? Why yes. "Water is essential for cooling the reactor core and also for generating steam to drive the turbines that produce electricity. Most nuclear power plants are located near large bodies of water like rivers, lakes, or oceans for this purpose."
Doesn't *have* to be water. Both US and USSR launched satellites with a reactor cooled by a eutectic sodium-potassium alloy (NaK). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SNAP-10A
Would regular size reactors be able to be cooled that way? Is it economically feasible to do it here? Seems like a better way to fuel these ai buildings vs using up water. Btw, thanks for info.
My eyes saw "eutectic," my brain read "eucalyptus" and I was very confused for a second there.
Epstein files are the new GTA6
Isn't he special. 🙄
He is aware that NASA needs funding to do that, right? Like, even if they contract most of it and we wind up creating a lunar chernobyl? Rockets and fuel aren't free yet.
FRAUD. WASTE. ABUSE.
this is what you get when you spread the stupid around.
This bitch gonna blow up the moon
So pretty much never. Never mind why DuffBeer thinks we need that on the moon. Thanks to the gutting of NASA we have no vehicles within a ten plus year horizon capable of even thinking about this level of project.
But first can we get frickin sharks with frickin lasers please?
He has been screwing up earth transportation. Sean Duffy is not a nuclear physicist, but perhaps he slept at a Holiday Inn Express last night and woke up particularly enlightened today... 🙄
Hopefully, Space X is not delivering the payload.
🎶If you believe, they’ll put a nuke on the moon (nuke on the moon); If you believe, Epstein had nothing to see (nothing that’s news)…
Government contractors are salivating.
*buy an obsolete jumbo jet *re-open Alcatraz *build a gilded ballroom in the White House *put a nuclear reactor on the Moon Amazing…Trump Admin 2.0 is a parody of Trump Admin 1.0
Gru…is that you?
So never?🤣
The moon DOESN'T BELONG TO THE UN-UNITED STATES GFC.
The moon will be cool what with the nukes and the robotaxis
youtu.be/nCP3LZoxABs?...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=goh2...
How long until musk starts an extraterrestrial nuclear reactor company?
Da fuq??
Do you really have any sort of confidence that the Trump administration is competent enough to set up a lemonade stand that holds up to gravity, let alone (effectively) a nuclear bomb on the moon?
How? The logistics alone…He is an idiot
That's fiscal conservatism, baby!
There will be no nuclear reactor on the Moon.
This is how desperate they are to change the subject.
This unqualified buffoon can't even get planes to land safely in the usa. He should get on the first rocket to the moon with musk.
Honest question: why do we need a nuclear reactor on the moon?
Just nuking the moon is no longer politically acceptable
I think they're hoping to curb the moon bear population.
For the Space Nazis to power their under-moon cities, of course.
If these people can’t maintain safe flight networks, how can they create a nuclear reactor not the moon? No risk here with these buffoons, right?
Stupid is as stupid does……
Time to rewatch "Space: 1999" methinks
My thoughts exactly!
for what though
For some reason, this news is bringing up memories of that old 70's sci-fi show Space 1999 for me.
A Space X rocket carrying nuclear fuel to the moon... wow.
What a bunch of crap - he will be long dead before the technology is available for that. Wasting taxpayers money is all that is. Consider how much good the money for such could do for the planet Earth!
Ffs
Why
That's basically all I say when these people do anything.
With Sean Duffy at the helm, the moon will explode and our tides will rise. It’s as ridiculous as Sean Duffy is.
They will justify this with a "National Security" veil of secrecy, then reward the contract to the biggest Trump coin buyer. The American people will find no public benefit, unless we are all refueling on our trip to Mars in our personal tesla spaceships in 10 years. With autopilot of course!
Why is the guy from the Real World in charge of Nasa now?
Didn't we stop launching plutonium cores into space in the 1970s for a very good reason?
Neither will happen