Look I know the US navy always wants to expand the amount of high-end capabilities deployed in the water, but we have to draw a line at "planes"
Look I know the US navy always wants to expand the amount of high-end capabilities deployed in the water, but we have to draw a line at "planes"
Counterpoint
Do you think they could be covering up selling those planes for profit?
no
I think it’s a hare brained scheme to just get spiffy watches.
too soon
There was probably some tie-down equipment that had a woke word in the name so we had to get rid of it. Maybe equalizer straps or something
Transport logistics -> [redacted] port logistics -> whoops we thought you meant "put it in the sea"
This headline is infuriating because the incident here is the one from earlier this week, there haven’t been any additional planes lost; it’s two overboard and one shot down in December. The fourth incident is the ship to ship collision. All of which is bad! But the headline is misleading
It's plane to see that we have a logistical problem here
Trump will re-classify them as subs, fill them with uranium, and ship them to Aus as nuclear subs and thus fulfilment of AUKUS 😑
What do you think is really happening?
I expect a combination of overwork, fatigue, and that they are running more missions than the public appreciates
wow. thassa lotta jets..
You’re killing me.
Planes are just $60 million dollar torpedoes when you think about it.
CNO: why do we have so many FOP reports these days? MCPO: ah well sir they're actually PFOB's CNO: What the hell is a PFOB MCPO: well, you know how FOP is Fell Off Plane and FOB is Fell Off Boat CNO: Get on with it MCPO: We uhhhh had to create a new report, Plane Fell Off Boat
They're experimenting with new seaplanes And just like what RFK Jr suggested for vaccines, they're testing against placebo controls