Right. It's not clear what Intel is recieving as consideration, given that the funds are already legally theirs. But, yknow, not my wheelhouse
Right. It's not clear what Intel is recieving as consideration, given that the funds are already legally theirs. But, yknow, not my wheelhouse
"Trump will not rage at us and our CEO" is both extremely corrupt and extremely valuable consideration.
When CHIPS and Science Act was passed, it gave the executive very broad leeway to use the funds as they see fit. Because Congress can't be bothered to actually set standards for use.
Sure, in the sense that I can see the board valuing that, but not obviously in the sense that it is a legitimate consideration
Like "I am giving the mafia money to not burn my business down" is a transaction where both parties in some abstract market sense receive something of value, but still, not a transaction that is legitimate
Also, anyone confident Trump would hold up his end of that deal is overconfident.
To be fair, that hasn’t actually been tested in front of the Roberts court, has it?
cut to @hurricanexyz.bsky.social saying about blackmail is speech
In some abstract sense every market transaction is an expressive act
💯
Not even that abstract! "I prefer this good to this amount of money"
If market transactions didn't have expressive content then the whole Hayek price mechanism thing wouldn't work
Whoa whoa whoa but not, like, in a BDS way, okay?
Some just come with prison time
if intel made this deal outside the US, wouldn't this be textbook FCPA violating?
I think it is safe to say that if US companies were, in, say, 2014, interacting with the government of, say, Nigeria or Egypt in the same way they are acting with respect to the US government in 2025, the FBI would be indicting several of their directors
Tbd whether it pans out that way in a future admin. But it should.
Yeah. I’m not sure what the statute of limitations would be on something like this, but we’re starting to say least get close to the date on which I’d start to get seriously nervous doing anything for Trump.
Entirely seriously the next admin should be indicting a lot of people who go along with any of this
"but I needed to in order to get things done" cool story bro, tell it to the jury
Extortion is always the defense to bribery and vice versa
I want all the general counsels to testify when the directors claim their lawyer said it was fine.
REMINDER, once again, to everyone involved: The Supreme Court says the President has immunity; the Supreme Court HAS NOT SAID THAT ABOUT YOU OR ANYONE ELSE INVOLVED
That ship sailed.
I honestly think everypotential Democratic candidate needs to expressly say this. Congressional candidates need to announce that they’re planning on holding extensive public hearings backed by their contempt powers. Etc.
Loooooota reasons it's not up to me, but man, if it were, I would be putting the fear of God into corporate america that if you want to be a part of this, you better hope this admin lasts forever
Minimum of five years.
Interesting. (I’ma tax guy, and tax SoLs are generally 3 years.)
Honestly
They need to meet certain requirements (including regarding their new A14A process) to get the rest of the money and it’s not clear, given how their business was going, that they could.