This is just loose. You have to look at the words. The important part is 5(b). Most of the analysis doesn't get beyond counting the number of times the ECHR is referred to. As if people don't want to believe the words used.
This is just loose. You have to look at the words. The important part is 5(b). Most of the analysis doesn't get beyond counting the number of times the ECHR is referred to. As if people don't want to believe the words used.
I am looking at the words! You're the one trying to wriggle off the hook of the literal meaning of 5(b), namely that ECHR compliance is a safeguard for the good functioning of the institutions - while gesturing towards loose arguments allegedly made by others.