NEW: Keir Starmer reacts supportively to the US strikes on Iran. “Iran’s nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.”
NEW: Keir Starmer reacts supportively to the US strikes on Iran. “Iran’s nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.”
The USA has committed a war crime and Britain should be condemning that. Trump is an absolute disgrace, his vanity lost the Iranian nuclear deal. The consequences are on him.
Well that's the UK stuffed then. WIlson faced the same political pressures over Vietnam and he didn't cave in to Lyndon Johnson. Harold Wilson: The Man Who Kept Us Out Of Vietnam share.google/aXpRqoQWtDw0...
Keir Starmer is a Zionist supporter - for him it’s Israel first .. and feck the rest of us. Mind you all UK politicians would act as he has. Feck Israel!
Keir starmer reacts supportively to fascist dictators attack on Iran. Fixed your headline.
He misspelled elevate.
What a disappointing twit Keir has turned out to be.
Starmer is an idiot. Trump doesn't do anything to make the world safer. He bombed Iran because his military parade was a flop and he wants to feel tough. This was unnecessary and will make every American a target for retaliation. Are there no smart people left in England either?
Yet again, Keir Starmer reinforces my opinion that he is a complete twat.
Final straw with this guy.
Agree
Lol, is this journalism in 2025?
Really interested in whether UK was notified of the intent to attack those sites…
Well Congress wasn't
Exactly- and the Dem leadership wasn’t either…
Doesn't matter, they are all fully unboard. Their only concern is 'protocol' and whether they get to play warmongers too.
Weak ass MF!
Starmer is a fool
Thanks to @uklabour.bsky.social 🥀 the threat to the UK from terrorism is about to increase from SUBSTANTIAL to SEVERE
Fresh off the CIA teleprompter.....
bsky.app/profile/muel...
The important part that you’ve missed is US attacks. Not that the UK has been involved. I just hope Starmer keeps it that way
Would you mind an Islamist state who contains some folks who don't seem to care if they live or die in some circumstances having a nuclear weapon. Not one you put on a missle but one you can put in a suitcase.
Who and what does Keir work for? because it sure as hell isn't the British public, world peace or the upkeep of international law.
@PaulBrand is being disingenuous and hoping that people will react, as you have done! Starmers statement aligns with Canada and EU. There is no 'agreement', just a statement of fact. These 'journalists' don't work for UK, world peace or international law. Constantly rabble rousing.
they are not ' facts ' they are opinions
If you can find any facts please share them as there's a general shortage at the moment.
Fact both Israel and the USA have illegally attacked a sovereign country. You can't bomb a country on the grounds they *might* attack you one day.
Ffs.
If there's a fascist in the world wanting to do fascist things, there's a fairly good chance that Keir Starmer will be the first in line to suck him off.
Starmer is repulsive. He works for Israel and the US.
The fact you’ve not stated Keir just justified an illegal act of war shows just how complicit the msm is
That doesn't read as supportive?
Nothing like stirring a hornets nest when they've settled down for the night. Let's not act surprised when this drags on for further decades.
Scotland said NO to Iraq. Westminster sent us anyway. No more illegal wars. No more PMs bowing to the White House. Independence = peace, dignity, self-determination. #ScottishIndependence #NeverAgain #NoMoreWars
You obviously don't have a strong grasp of Real Politic. UNFORTUNATELY we cannot tell Americans and Trump in particular to Fuck Off. Yes we would really really like to. But the world has developed so we need to some extent keep on the good side of the orange fart machine. Sad but true.
N/A
??
what carney said verbatim. everyone has received their marching orders
Wasn't he a lawyer back in the day?
“Keir Starmer releases statement on US attack on Iran in line with every other major leader in the EU, including Canada.” Fixed it for you. 🤪🙄🙄🙄
The, UK/US/any country with nuclear programmes, is a grave threat to international security. He is a moron.
WTF
Where did I hear that before? Oh yeah Iraq!
Starmer is such a lily livered pos.
So he's just begging for terrorist and retaliatory strikes against the u.k. now? fucking right-winger
That's disappointing.
Re-read it as individual sentences. At no point does the statement express support. Displayed here are two sentences, neither of which suggests or denies support. Whether or not you accept the threat from Iran as fact, it simply states that the US has taken action.
The weasel coward fuck. How does he manage to take the wrong stance on every fucking issue?!? Fuck.
Diago Garcia was used to bomb Iran - and that is a UK military asset.
Gutless and disappointing...but sadly unsurprising at this point. When Trump comes to the UK, best form of protest would be empty streets. That would really hurt his ego and send our Govt. a message.
Starmer is a poodle to Trump as Blair was to Bush.
Wtf did we just voted in to No. 10? Looks more and more like a right wing cuckoo’s egg.
My understanding is that it's a statement, not support. I hope I'm not wrong.
Just leaving this here. God our PM is useless. bsky.app/profile/jere...
Sod off, Kier. IL are genocidal psycopaths. Is this the sort of administraion you want the UK to be seen to be 'supporting' ? Never mind the crackpot facist USA lot. This is what will define how people vote next election as they'll remember whether you grew a spine now @teamlabouruk.bsky.social
“The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis.”
Wasn’t Iran at the table when Trump’s patience wore out and Israel attacked them?
Yes they was and are willing to return if Isreal and now America stop aggression towards them which both initiated
They had the deal back in 2015 but Trump didn't like it, because it had Obama's signature.
"I said 'You had 2 weeks' and so I bombed you 2 days later because you didn't take me up within the 2 weeks.... Errrrr ... I dunno, weeks , days, errr, what's the difference... I dunno. Nobody knows. I get confused"
Iran never left the negotiatiating table. Israel attacked to put a halt to negotiation.
Say goodbye to the next election Labour. You fools.... 😖
Pretty sure they’ve been at the negotiating table since the Obama presidency only for Trump to renege several times
Iran was at the negotiating table. Seems they were talking to liars.
I shouted at the telly when I heard Starmer say this! I’m also way more scared that the Israelis actually have nuclear weapons!
observing the near universal lack of criticism of israel's actions
Iran never left the table until the US attacked them. Talks were ongoing. Weapons inspectors on sites. Who could blame the Iranians if they did develop nuclear weapons, to deter further attacks from the world's terrorists?
So you've given up on actually doing your job then?
Supportive of ethnic cleansing. Supportive of genocide. Supportive of attacking a sovereign nation. International law is dead and buried. A human rights lawyer called Starmer has played his part in destroying international law. No longer applies to Israel & USA is just meaningless.
I'm assuming that the G7 leaders decided that one of them would have to stay close to Trump!? Starmer either drew the short straw, or we got lucky with having Charles!? Trouble is that innocent people in the UK will pay a price!!
Gross - so much history repeating like a wet burp
Starmers statement aligns with Canada and EU. There is no 'agreement', just a statement of fact.
He does know everyone knows he is lying
Absolutely predictable. Because the UK government is incapable of having foreign policy independent of the US. Even when they are led by an incompetent psychopath like Trump. Let’s hope parliament remembers Iraq and Afghanistan.
This guy is 100% gonna do Iraq again.
He always was.
Starmer just handed power to Reform 🤦♀️🤬
Israel's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security...
What a coward he is.
Starmer the lawyer supports a clear breach of international law. How long before Starmer becomes an ally of Putin?
Hrs a fuckin gobshyte
Of course he has, look up Labour Friends of Israel, and whilst you're doing that also look up Conservative Friends of Israel. Starmer and members of his cabinet have received "contributions" from LFI. Why do you think Corbyn was attacked from within? Starmer is a fraud.
It’s not ‘supportively’ at all. It’s a carefully crafted diplomatic statement similar to the the EU have put out. He nether supports nor condemns
He supports it, just as he supports Israel starving Palestinians to death, because he's a gruesome right-wing Muslim-hating racist piece of shit.
And you appear to be a far left crank. Like a good sheeple, repeating the last baseless slur you’ve heard from your echo chamber Nice.
This would be funny at the best of times, the fact you're doing in the replies to a journalist reporting Starmer's own words where he outlines his support for these illegal acts of aggression is even funnier. I suppose the truth is whatever Dear Leader tells you it is?
He’s advocating negotiation. Maybe try reading his words… He neither support or condemns Same position as the EU. Are they right wing POS too…!?
He's Framed it around the Zionist narrative about the Iranian "threat" ,no mention to the illegality,unprovoked aggression of the USA or indeed Israel previously. It's tacit support.
"I hate innocent people dying for absolutely no reason" You - 'far left crank'
"Why hasn't the Human Rights Lawyer, Kieth Starmer, condemned this blatant breach of International Law and the UN Charter?" "Shut up, crank, and learn to enjoy the smell of burning flesh like I have"
You appear to be attributing replies to posts that don’t exist. Maybe try re-reading the thread. That may help.
You're trying to justify killing innocent people. I've read enough.
No. Try again. But if that helps justify your ridiculous made up conversation. Please yourself Although it does explain why you fail to grasp the position of EU/UK Both calling for negotiation. Yes!?
OK Mr Brand, the next time you are reporting on Iran's rights to self defence, please ask why Israel is allowed nuclear weapons, and why Israel prevents the IAEA from auditing Israel's nuclear programme. Simple questions we *need* journalists to be asking of our politicians.
The kind of stance that could finish off the Labour Party
It’s the same stance as the EU.
My concern is that if Iran closes the straits of Hormuz we may get bullied into joining this war. If we do we're complicit. If we don't Trump will use that to weaken support for Eastern Europe against Russia.
You know he's not supporting the US's actions, he clearly says he wants people to come back to the table and reach a diplomatic solution. Misinformation and fear mongering is just lazy and irresponsible journalism.
Iran were at the table then Israel and America attacked them.
Nobody is agreeing with what the US / Israel has done, that in no way means we shouldn't be encouraging all parties to come to the table.
You’re so naive bless you
You’re an idiot
You're way too old to have not grown out of name calling. Good luck in life.
At least I am not shilling for a genocide supporter, hun
Get over yourself, you fucking Kevin
😂
He literally is, this is weird denialism.
He literally isn't, saying he wants a diplomatic solution and ensures stability, which is the same message sent out by EU leaders (among others) is not supporting the US.
"The US has taken action to alleviate a threat" sounds like pretty positive language for an unsupportive person...
The US did take action, did they not? You seem to think stating what happened is supporting something. Strange logic I'll give you that.
The "alleviate a threat" part is the bit I take umbrage with. They bombed a sovereign nation without provocation.
Because that's what the US said they were doing and what led to their action. Stating what happened does not mean you support something it just doesn't, no matter how you twist it.
Ok Ostrich.
Ostrich?
Ostrich
He's clearly following the Zionist narrative that illegal acts of war are acceptable.
Where did he say it was acceptable?
By not condemning it and framing it around the Zionist narrative, he's giving tacit approval.
So in your head every one of our allies leaders are zionist and just playing their narrative?
Not in my head,in Fact.
OK, ta.
If you have an argument to make that could help me change my mind, I'm all ears?
I'm alright thanks. Have a good night.
I'll take that as a no. Have a good night too.
trump said "NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE" too. be serious.
Someone else said something different at a different point so that must mean Starmer approves of what the US did last night? Even you must realise that's a weak argument.
i'm pointing out that a half-hearted claim to want peace attached to a defence of war does not override it
But he hasn't defended war, literally the point.
Do you not agree that the US has taken steps to alleviate the threat? Simply stating what's happened is not supporting it. Iran's nuclear programme being a threat is the general consensus between all of our allies, has been for a long time.
If it weren't for Trump scrapping the initial agreement we wouldn't be here now.
You'll also see Starmer wanting discussion and reaching a diplomatic solution, taking a wild guess you just think that's him lying, or it's not important.
starmer and his ilk have lied at every stage of this conflict, but of course it's unthinkable they're lying now
of course not. the u.s. has reemphasized that states without nuclear weapons will never be safe from the hegemony's violent whims. starmer is endorsing the nonsense logic of the attack, which is endorsing the attack. guarantee you would understand this in the other direction!
And the US is of course wrong, nobody is defending what's been done, simply pointing out that you're trying to twist words into something they're not. He hasn't endorsed anything, he's used the exact same language other world leaders have used, and remain united at the need for diplomatic solutions
like, if a politician said the october 7 operation made it more likely that palestinians held hostage by israel would be released, y'alls would shriek about that being an endorsement of the attacks
Wtf are you on about October 7th for, and just curious as to who you think y'all is?
UK foreign policy not up for democratic debate, as always
Vote for whoever you like, when the US says jump, they'll ask how high
Not over the Vietnam war. Labour PM Harold Wilson, facing the same political and economic pressures as Starmer, refused to send British troops.
I'll confess I didn't consider all the way back to more than 20 years before I was born
Some interesting parallels. Worth knowing about, even if you weren't even a twinkle in your parents' eyes. www.forcesnews.com/news/harold-...
Disgraceful decision by Starmer over a claim Iran is developing nuclear weapons. June 18th 2025: IAEAl Rafael Grossi, "While it is possible that there are operations being kept secret from regulators, reports that Iran has NOT been actively pursuing a nuclear weapon since 2003 are accurate"
We recall UK's Labour PM Blair & his support of Bush's actions in Iraq over spurious 'intelligence' report of WMD - none were ever found. But the consequences were disastrous. 'Three truths about the Iraq war and its consequences' on.ft.com/4lbBRU8
He's a liar then
Another illegal war with another right wing Labour PM.
Iran knew this was coming. They will have taken measures to protect the most critical equipment. All this will have achieved is to bolster support for the regime in Iran and further convince them of the need for nuclear weapons
There isn't a nation on earth "responsible" or moral enough to own nuclear weapons, and if there was a ranking, Israel and the US would be at the very bottom of the list of countries when it comes to meeting that criterion
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
I think Trump dropped those papers on purpose.
He knew it would turn into a meme.
Were any other countries, say UK, involved in refueling of the B-2s during their mission ? Does UK Govt accept that this is an act of self-defence, and that Iran posed an imminent military nuclear threat to Israel and US ? theconversation.com/are-israels-...
“Supportively”? Are you on glue? It’s the same as every other cautious and bland response to the situation.
See the almost identical statement by the Canadian PM.
I just don’t think these people get that those people have to work in different orders of magnitude from the people they personally work with Mon-Fri despite thinking people in their own work hierarchy are cunts and they never say boo to a goose. “Well if I was at work I’d say” The fuck you would
I have ‘grow some balls’ muted.
And all its variants. Just ludicrous tbh. Good luck to the country. Addicted to drama and no governance. It’s just not serious
What the hell is he thinking? We are now complicit in an illegal war started by a deranged moron
bollocks
Here we go again. It went so well in Iraq and Afghanistan. My dad used to live in Cyprus and I’m honestly glad he’s dead because how are we not painting targets on the RAF bases there by letting the US use them?
Talked supportively afterwards, but didn’t allow the use of a UK airfield for the attack. There must be a reason the US used a base in their own territory when there were closer bases in allied countries. Allies wanted no part of it.
the USA conducted the attack directly from the USA and a ship that fired cruise missiles , no overseas bases were used for the bombers
Utterly predictable from the pathetic, lying shithouse. Human rights lawyer my arse.
That’s my vote gone. Starmer is SUCH a massive disappointment
The thing is - no one can be at all surprised that Starmer has taken the path he has. I wonder what Starmer the human rights lawyer would think of Starmer the Prime Minister
Yep.
Think labour will lose a lot of voters over this other heartless decisions they’ve made. Sadly, the alternatives seem worse.
Until Labour go back to the party of John Smith I won’t be voting for them.
Mine too
Yes because Reform will be soooo much more left wing 🤔
…. And there lies the problem. In a FPTP system, the loser is democracy itself.
Agreed
Is there not other options? Why would you justify voting for a party who not only supports, but are complicit in genocide? You are aware of independent candidates are available too. Keep voting for the same thing, why would expect changes? Red/blue tories and reform are all the same
Sigh. Wait until we get Reform and see if you can spot the difference then. So tired of that stupid and manifestly fake moral equivalence.
We’ve had over 20 years of “if you don’t vote for the slightly less cuntier politician who COULD win then the worse one will.” Fuck them and fuck genocide apologists. They take our vote and keep sucking gammon dick on our behalf. Let Reform win, I hope they completely bury Labour and Tories.
Let's not let reform win. #NeverReform
I hate that I’m saying this Carole because I know it’s a cliche but… They’re literally all the same. Spineless, money grubbing, unprincipled, baby-eating bastards to a man.
You just need to look at Scotland to see what can happen if you actually put people and not the rich first.
Don't disagree with that. But reform won't give you that.
I don't agree.
Oh. Okay then. Well that certainly changes how I look at things with regards to bombing kids and shooting people begging for food, Carole. Think you’ve turned me into an indifferent centrist shitehawk. Thanks pal 👍
Reform, red or blue tories, they are all the same.
Let's stop offering watered down versions of Reform 'policies' - it only lends them a false air of respectability and encourages people to vote for them as they will always prefer the genuine article
When your only political strategy is blackmail you’re both morally and intellectually bankrupt.
Overstatement but I know what you mean
You have a leader who attacked pensioners, children, the poor, justified genocide, collective punishment and ethnic cleansing. Tell me again how moral red or blue tories are again
Which part of anything I said is wrong? Which part is fake?
...and the silence is deafening
not voting for Labour does not mean we have to vote Reform
Erm...FPTP means a binary choice. Only two pairs ever have a realistic chance of winning. It doesn't matter if you vote for the fascists, not voting for the not fascists lets the fascists win. You knew that, right?
the rules have changed we will vote for 3rd parties and lots of them are going to win you are correct in that in many constituencies the main contenders will be Labour and Reform but thats a choice between shit and shitter Labour can change course or lose
The rules haven't changed. I'm sure Reform will win now, probably with some agreement with the Tories. The right apparatus swallow compromise to gain power. Plus they have a killer support coalition of Nazis "labour aren't far right enough" and left wing "labour aren't far left enough"
Exactly mate
This is not the US. There are not just two options. We're at a point where we are likely to have a plurality of parties with good chunks of seats. The old "you have to vote for us to stop them" canard no longer works.
You are genocide supporter nazi.
Labours own action are the ones enabling Reform, by copying their policies they legitimise their position. The result? 15%+ of previous Labour voters are now going to vote Reform. Labour did this to themselves, don't go blaming us for this shit.
I don't agree with this analysis. There is a xenophobic groundswell but just in this country but across the west. It, turbo charged by lures, powered Brexit, bright trump to power, fuels the rust of the fat right in Italy, Germany, France, Netherlands etc. to blame Labour is a bit daft.
Of course many former voters will jump ship to an irrelevant party and feel all pure and uncompromised because that is the nature of the left. This is how the Tories have gained power and wrecked our country. Labour is very very slowly fixing it. Give them a chance. There one year in
What is it about a party who justify attacking pensioners, the disabled, children, women, and verbalised their support for genocide and collective punishment makes you think they give a shit about anyone but themselves?
Tinkering so things get slowly better is a 1 term plan. The cruelty of the attacks on the disabled, Palestinian’s, the poor, people protesting for a liveable planet, Trans people, Refugees… it turns pro Labour votes into anti Reform votes at best. I should want to vote for them but I really don’t.
Understandable.
In which case, they could start trying to fight it? Rather than, you know, channeling Enoch Powell. Just a thought.
Fair point
Labour are complicit and playing to the right wing racists
Labour are part of that same team. Starmer and his ilk are right-wing authoritarians. They might have a think veneer of respectability (and let's face it, that's all libs care about) but they are essentially the same
Silly.
Only from the perspective of someone fully immersed in the liberal capitalist system.
What people really need in this country is courage of our convictions, not running so scared of farage that we abandon all principles. Is that what we are now? Is that what you accept?
Ok, I agree. Labour is only as bad as Tory. Reform will probably be worse.
I remain a strong advocate for not voting for someone you disagree with.
Other parties are available
Ahh just fuck off. No. They'll be exactly the same.
What a dickhead you are. Fuck off yourself, cretin.
Your binary world fails you.
no one is buying this tawdry argument anymore
It's interesting how you're trying to equate not voting for Labour as being a vote for Reform. And by interesting I mean pathetic. Problem is you know Labour are irredeemably awful and this is the only reaction you have left.
So you're saying we should now support genocides and illegal wars to keep the right wing fanatics out ?
And the goalposts will keep moving. Soon it’ll be “the only way we can stop the rise of fascism in the U.K. is to start putting up concentration camps and sending foreigners there”. I hated Twitter because of the right-wingers but I actually loathe BlueSky because of the centrists.
... who will find any excuse to drift inexorably rightwards. The way to beat Reform is to oppose them, not to offer watered down versions of their policies
Honestly, with the rightwing you could at least have a laugh at their ridiculous popsitions...
In all honesty I don't have a lot of centrists on my feed, they tend to not gain much traction here
Why doesn’t he tell the truth that Israel is a grave threat to world peace. Has he haste Parliament or his population what they think of Israel and American actions? I for one do not support this. Iran were at the negotiating table. Now they know there is no point negotiating.
Very disappointed in pStarmer,but don’t forget that if the Tories or Reform were in power they would have done exactly the same.This is on Trump.
Priti Patel was encouraging the US attacks this week
And Farage seems to be keeping his head down even though Trump's been his bestie for years...
Could you also report that the IAEA stated that Iran is not close to producing a bomb? Mainstream news usually likes to bothsides things.
Lost some more votes. What a dickhead.
Is there any daylight between Starmer and Trump on anything?
Where is the evidence of Iran attempting to develop a nuclear weapon? This looks to be the same BS that we saw in Iraq with WMDs only this time the journalists turned a blind eye.
We were fed this donkey butter about Iraq by Blair. WE👏🏻DON'T👏🏻 BELIEVE 👏🏻YOU👏🏻
I wonder what caused that aggression towards Western countries? I wonder....
Fuck sake Paul. You KNOW he didn’t support this attack. This isn’t journalism. This is drivel.
Agree. Drivel indeed .
What am I missing? www.theguardian.com/world/2025/j...
The Guardian chooses to interpret his tweet as support.
Yes. The guardian editorial stance is “Farage for PM” It’s the Daily Mail in grown up clothes.
If you believe a @theguardian.com headline , it's worth asking yourself what their agenda is. I've no idea who they actually want in government but it certainly isn't Labour.
Are they lying about Starmer? No they're not. I have no idea what your agenda is, but Labour government is indistinguishable from Tory government.
Pants.
They lie about Keir Starmer all the time, but you believe just what you want to.
My thoughts exactly! So much easier to whinge and whine than do a bit of sensible research.
He backed the action, just as he backed the collective punishment of Palestinians through cutting off food and water....before lying about having done so, despite the fact we heard him say it. The man is a liar and an enabler of ethnic cleansing, too.
Oh yes, utterly indistinguishable. 🙄
Yes. The quite clearly and demonstrably are lying. And the cranks lap up up like MAGA morons believing Trump when he says “other countries pay the tarrifs”.
That the headline is a bare faced lie. The guardian is right wing rag since it changed ownership.
Ok so what DID Sir Keir say?
Look at what Cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds says in the article.
But of course he did. I would be shocked if he ever did the right thing, even once.
Keir Starmer can go...... himself Pathetic little shit Apart from anything else Trump was acting illegally according to the American constitution Not forgetting " 2 weeks" lies Seems like allies are falling for this 👇
What a terribly disappointing statement.
Starmer is a Zionist asset
Oh really. After seeing the lengths that Israel have gone to to ethnically cleanse Gaza, you think it's ok for them to have the bomb but no other middle Eastern country.
Starmers statement aligns with Canada and EU. There is no 'agreement', just a statement of fact.
its 2 lines of opinion not ' fact'.
Worth mentioning the context that every intelligence agency said that Iran was not making a bomb? Or just can't be bothered to do your job?
Disgusting - Starmer’s Iraq.
So presumably there is no longer any reason for strikes on Iran now that its nuclear sites have been ‘ ?obliterated’
“New intel suggests…”
Fucking embarrassing
Quite unbelievable. His nose must be covered in Trump’s brown stuff.
Just like every other world leader to some extent. This is Real Life not LOVE ACTUALLY.
No, stay out of trumps madness! He will destroy us....
C- must do better.”Reacts supportively “ is not the same as ‘actually supports” is it though ?No context ,rancid click bait.
Last straw for me too. I'm leaving the Labour party. Did Starmer learn nothing from Blair, Iraq and the WMD fiasco?
I left a couple of weeks ago. it wasn't an easy decision, but I no longer recognise the party I joined in 1979.
Seems more like the colonising aggressors are a grave threat to Iran.
shocking that Starmer, a lawyer, ignores the illegality of Trump’s action. I don’t think his stance of cosying up to Trump will end well for him
Starmer has turned out to be even more of a disappointing wet-wipe than I already thought he was 😞
Supportive? That's an overreach!
"supportively" is doing a lot of heavy lifting. That statement is as anodyne as possible. Humphrey himself could have crafted it.
Are some politicians compromised? Bill Clinton alluded to a, at least, 20yr plan by Netanyahu. Bit like a puzzle, Palantir, Musk, Eric Schmidt formerly Google, spent time assisting USA defence, also wrote a book with Henry Kissinger. Journo’s phones hacked by Pegasus. All appears planned.
bsky.app/profile/jere...
where is the support in that statement of fact?
Totally the wrong stance. The U.K. should have nothing to do with the Zionists war! 🇺🇸🇮🇱 For once Starmer should put Britain before Labour Friends of Israel! 😡💥🔥💥
Delivered from the supine position
Starmer spouting more nonsense.
Oh god, it’s Iraq 2003 all over again, isn’t it…
and you’re telling us this guy used to be a lawyer right?
Shame on Starmer. Does he now illegal actions? Maybe someone could ask him.
Continuing his role as paper picker!
Arse-kisser.
Poodle
Well, that's a positive take on an unprovoked invasion.
Starmers statement aligns with Canada and EU. There is no 'agreement', just a statement of fact.
Yeah, nah. It's still an unprovoked invasion.
Why do people not actually read the articles and make up their own mind rather than read a headline and accept its conclusion?
It was ever thus. When I worked in media that kind of lazy supposition and plain bitching used to infuriate me. Then I realised some people just borrow ideas, or whine for the hell of it. It's a lazy excuse for shouting. Some do love to moan. Any excuse will do.
Starmer is parroting Zionist Propoganda.
Of course he did
In your opinion. It’s pretty neutral but journalists can’t actually report anything without giving their expert view.
Keir Starmer is a fucking joke. He lives in Trump's bowels.
🎯
Seriously, what do people think Iran is going to do with nuclear weapons that is different to those countries that already have them? Please elaborate and then think about what the reaction would be from those who already have nukes. There is a reason why no one uses nukes …..
In most cases, that would be true. The UK would never make a small one and give it to a group to place in Russia or China. Would you bet your life that Iran wouldn't send one that way to Washington or London. Unlikely, it's not Impossible.
Whilst not impossible, it is also traceable. Do you also trust Putin not to smuggle lethal weapons/chemicals into other countries to kill vast numbers of people? Cities like Salisbury for example. www.dhs.gov/archive/news...
Don’t get me wrong, Iran is a difficult country to deal with, but nukes ensure mutual destruction, and surely even Iran knows that.
I don’t see the Big Orange Man Baby dropping bombs on Russia, and yet Russia has already used chemical weapons in UK to kill UK citizens (unlike Iran) and Russia repeatedly threatens to nuke UK cities.
What about the legality of it?
It seems that Starmer with all his multitude of other faults is also a cowardly little shit
International law says what?
American law says to attack a foreign country you need a vote in Congress
No it doesn’t. Presidents can act unilaterally for 60 days.
There's a Congress?
Dumb and Dumber
So it seems Israel is in control of UK policy while ethnically cleansing and committing a genocide and instigating a war .
Starmer really is a dick, even in war nuclear sites are not to be attacked. The Orange Felon said Europe was on their own over Ukraine, I take it the same applies to Iran, US on their own.
On dear. Has Starmer learnt nothing from Blair's legacy? Great PM at home. Fucked up internationally by getting too close to Bush.
When protesters broke into a military base setting fire to planes, in protest against the Iraq war Starmer defended them arguing that they were trying to stop an illegal war. #LestWeForget #Gaza #Palestine #Iran #IsraelWarCrimes
When can we expect Starmer to publish the dodgy dossier? #HistoryRepeating
Being disappointed by Keir Starmer has been bad enough. Feeling embarrassed by him is worse. Embarrassed for him, worse still. We already have enough British politicians kowtowing to that fascist oaf.
Amazed he found the time to comment what with being so far up Donald Trump's arse he can see Nigel Farage's shoes
I AM SO DISAPPOINTED WITH THIS DAMN LABOUR GOVERNMENT THAT I WAITED 14 LONG MISERABLE YEARS FOR !!!
Starmer is such a full of shit liar. I wonder if Thatchers brain was removed from her cold dead corpse and put in Starmers colon as a backup.
Oh yes. Let's have " Oh Jeremy Corbyn " back. I don't like government and having to do things. Much easier in opposition. Let's stay there.
Benefitted much from your beloved zionist Starmer? He's a lying scumbag devoid of morals and wholly owned by Israel.
Starmers statement aligns with Canada and EU. There is no 'agreement', just a statement of fact.
no just opinions
I see you’re a hater of ignorance? Both the US and UK have specialist analysts of both satellite, electronic communication and intelligence operatives on the ground. Which are the basis of the leaders decisions. It’s these gathered facts that are the basis of these decisions.
and the USA assessment was that there was no imminent risk and even if it had been otherwise it would have been an ' opinion ' I am not ignorant enough that I do not understand the difference between opinions and facts.
An appalling statement my our PM. The USA is in violation of every international law governing the starting of wars. They should be condemned for it.
bsky.app/profile/seth...
And what’s Reform’s view on it? After all that’s all the opinion we get these days from a party with 5 MPs
We certainly do not want to do what the previous labour government did and sent our troops to battle, illegally! Stomach should seek advice from other politicians in Westminster before doing anything, otherwise he’s just as bad as Bliar!
Does Starmer have access to Israel's PreCogs?