Also: forcing people to read books they don't want to read in order to prove or show they read them is equateable to forced religion. Under this rule you'd be forced to not only read the Bible but show you read it with a proper summary

It's still obvious though that y'all are willing to put every hurtle in front of parents to not sexualize children.

I know right? It's like these degenerates want kids to know about their bodies! At this rate, no pastor will be safe from sexual assault charges!

No, but it's obvious you're dumber than the gravel on ground outside the library. Life tip: have you tried not being an idiot?

Or your saying you wouldn't accept being forced to read the Bible to have it banned?

Your claim is that you are not pushing sexual material involving sexual orientation into school libraries against federal regulations?

Not at all. My claim is that you're an idiot. Thank you for proving my point.

Not unless you prove that I'm wrong. Considering you started your reply with no to ignore my claim

Yawn, troll.

🥱

Hehe.

Watching out! The schools are trying to trans the kids! Kids who have to worry about school shootings should not be exposed to nipples!

Whatch out their trying to turn your kids to Jesus! No one cross a t low

Dude, be real. If Jesus was alive today, you would call him a communist and have him crucified. The American Jesus is not jesus. You are out of your fucking mind.

I'm not a Christian

Really A non christian concerned about the bible Very believable

Point was y'all give a completely opposite argument when others talk about teaching the Bible in school

Right but it's a poor analogy Because trans people exist and the bible is a make believe set of stories that include rape and incest being glorified. See the difference?

Christianity exists. And the argument presented here is that teaching kids about sex doesn't result in them being curious about sex, or influence their social trends, but y'all will immediately say the Bible teaches ignorance and violence because that content is present.

i think you're confused, probably because you're a deranged christian pervert, so let me say it clearer for you 1. Teaching kids about sex is important for a variety of reasons, including making sure they can identify abuse, and that they do it safely with their peers There is no number 2.

It's not the call of public schools and teachers in violation of the law to expose people's kids to sexual material or talks of sex or sexual orientation. It's against the law. Your arguing that anyone should be able to talk with kids about sex anywhere any time

Glorifying sexual situations. An apt analogy

So you're in agreement then, no more bibles and mind your own fucking business about kids libraries?

If no more Bibles, no more sexual material either

And only in the mind of a depraved christian pervert is glorifying sexual situations the same as glorifying rape and incest... see what you did there? Quite a freudian slip

The "rule" is no sexual material - in written word or illustration - that was created for the sole purpose of sexual arousal (the definition of pørn).

No, anything that to explain requires talks of sexuality, or sex acts without direct parental approval.