Me neither! I am very curious what Chair Powell's reaction will be but my understanding of the precedent around "for cause" removal is that accusations of *anything* are not sufficient to meet the standard. And her initial statement on this made it clear she wasn't going without a fight.
The Supreme Court’s shills DID just recently clarify there’s a little known Fed exception to the unitary executive
Its a little known codicil in the Faber College constitution
Also it's giving her defense attorneys some real ammo for the actual charges too of course
You have to consider that there’s a possibility that he’ll just put her in jail…
NAL but "for cause" becomes meaningless if you can accuse someone of a crime and use your own accusation as cause to fire them.
By this standard, Vance could be removed for sexual assault on a couch.