avatar
Nathan Goldwag @goldwagnathan.bsky.social

It depends on how you define "liberals", "fascism", and "socialism", all of which get used in so many contradictory ways that they're simply useless as signifiers without extensive commentary and clarification.

aug 29, 2025, 10:02 pm • 78 8

Replies

avatar
timmis.bsky.social @timmis.bsky.social

People who call themselves liberals in a US context, with the exception of NYT “even the liberals,” universally hate fascism, while people who call themselves socialists are disproportionately neutral to positive

aug 31, 2025, 7:56 pm • 4 1 • view
avatar
Astraea ΘΔ @astraeathedragon.bsky.social

We may rephrase it as "Status-quo establishment politicians and voters-- even those ostensibly on your side will prefer ever-increasing authoritarianism over advancing the working class." I think that preserves the intent of the phrase while being a bit more specific.

aug 30, 2025, 12:20 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
Astraea ΘΔ @astraeathedragon.bsky.social

(I make no claim as to the accuracy of this take.)

aug 30, 2025, 12:20 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
embracebecoming.bsky.social @embracebecoming.bsky.social

I feel like there are specific liberals for whom that is true and the current situation makes it pretty easy to separate the wheat from the chaff. Starmer, for instance, is someone for whom that saying is objectively true despite leading a party that is itself ostensibly socialist.

aug 29, 2025, 11:02 pm • 3 1 • view
avatar
Joel @storywonker.bsky.social

I mean i think describing Kier Starmer as a liberal is an example of stretching terms to the point of complete uselessness

aug 29, 2025, 11:05 pm • 15 4 • view
avatar
Joel @storywonker.bsky.social

He does not pursue liberal social policy. He does not pursue liberal economic policy. He is not a member of the Liberal party. He has never afaik self-described as a liberal. His governing style is a reaction to perceived over-liberalism of his party's previous government. So how's he a liberal?

aug 29, 2025, 11:05 pm • 13 1 • view
avatar
Joel @storywonker.bsky.social

He is, as he and his aides often point out, deeply embedded in the socialist traditions of Britain. It's just that he's deeply embedded in the part labelled "be racist and useless", which makes him a Wilsonite socialist

aug 29, 2025, 11:09 pm • 15 3 • view
avatar
Thomas Wood @advanced-eschatonics.com

Nobody wants to talk about Stalin libbing out and dissolving the comintern to promote united front tactics because then we can't larp like we're in Weimar Germany

aug 30, 2025, 12:58 am • 0 0 • view