Been doing it like crazy since the law-breaking spree began in January.

Because if SCOTUS decrees that he can do this, they don’t want to be on his bad side.

And the question is why?? Have they been so browbeaten into submission?

Have you considered the possibility that the owner and editor want to deliberately push this narrative?

Bad news is good news (for business)!

More than considered I am certain they are.

There are a lot of possible motives, but I’m curious which one(s) are the driving influences

Yeah, so much for the liberal media. It's been bad.

There is and hasn’t been a “liberal media”. There used to be fact based media because the white wing hate mongers couldn’t deal with reported facts so they found messaging to derail the truth. But now there is only legacy media, ALL owned by oligarchs.

I was being sardonic.

It's been common knowledge for centuries that newspapers & their editorial boards regularly make decisions about what types of stories to publish, & that their selection decisions are guided by their preferences (political, cultural, economic, social, etc.). This is certainly not news.

🎯 Well said.

NYT is totally complicit.

explicitly complicit…

How? They're just reporting what the demented imbecile said, which is true. I heard a radio report about it yesterday.

Always

They've clearly been in the tank for Republicans since the 1990s.

80 years later the NYT can’t face it’s simping for nazi’s shame…

90 years later and NYT still can’t face its Walter Duranty shame for being Stalin’s mouthpiece. Famine, what famine?

Their record on Hitler wasn't great, either.

It’s a joke and a disgrace. They once wrote a puff piece profile of the Fuehrer. Said his antisemitism was overblown. Days after it appeared, Hitler invaded Poland.

I saw a newspaper cutout on here, I'm pretty sure from NYT, that was like, "I got to walk through one of these new detention camps they've built and they're actually pretty nice." from like 1937 or something.

Even if so, you are obscuring the issue. Stick to the issue at hand. Trump is saying he's going to do an unconstitutional act by fiat.

I have a subscription through work. They currently have an entire section devoted to the troubles of the Democratic Party. It has subsections devoted to topics like "transgender rights."

The Trump era extends to the 1990s?

The Republican abandonment of democracy extends that far. (I'd put it in the '80s, myself.) Other hand, the NYT's friendliness toward fascist dictatorship goes back at least as far as trying to normalize Hitler in 1922.

Where's the section on "Republican party problems"?

the nyt stays complicit in the current trans genocide

I gave up on them the morning after the 2016 DNC, when their cover story about Hillary Clinton's historic nomination was illustrated by a photo of BILL Clinton. Anyone who thinks the NYT is liberal needs their head examined.