avatar
Kierkegaarden Cop @joshsteich.bsky.social

Dog, take the Dodgers Express bus c'mon

aug 29, 2025, 8:41 pm • 2 0

Replies

avatar
Andrew Rivas @rivasad.bsky.social

One transit option should be plenty!!!

aug 29, 2025, 8:42 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kierkegaarden Cop @joshsteich.bsky.social

Look at you, moving goalposts to string a gondola up

aug 29, 2025, 8:44 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Andrew Rivas @rivasad.bsky.social

What goalpost did I move? Do you also oppose CAHSR because you can take a few buses from SF to LA? The difference between the gondola and CAHSR is our tax dollars aren’t funding the gondola!

aug 29, 2025, 8:49 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kierkegaarden Cop @joshsteich.bsky.social

You started out with “god forbid LA encourage transit” then when I pointed out that there is transit, said it wasn’t enough & now seem to think gondolas are the best & only option, acting like the 2nd coming of hyperloop bros

aug 29, 2025, 8:58 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Andrew Rivas @rivasad.bsky.social

Gondolas are a real thing in other countries, it’s not crazy (unlike hyperloop). In all sincerity, it’s morally repugnant that anyone opposes legislation in our state for limiting environmental reviews *for transit projects* to 12 months. Can’t stand McCourt, but this was the wrong decision

aug 29, 2025, 9:03 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Bryan Wood @brwtwit.bsky.social

The problem with the gondola as transit is that it is specifically taking spectators to a ball game. 50K people want to get there at the same time, and leave at the same time. They don't want to wait in line to take a gondola 2 dozen at a time, and you can't add gondola frequency like a train or bus

aug 29, 2025, 10:50 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Andrew Rivas @rivasad.bsky.social

That’s a good reason for us to not fund it with tax dollars, not to prevent a private org from building one. Less than 5% of Dodgers game attendees take the bus. We don’t need to solve for “how to get 50k spectators on transit”, we need to solve for “how to get more than 2-3k out of cars”

aug 29, 2025, 10:58 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Brainspore @brainspore.bsky.social

It’s also a pretty good reason not to bypass existing rules and regulations to build this inefficient boondoggle, which is what the legislation McCourt was trying to push through would have done. I am pro-transit but that doesn’t mean I have to support another billionaire vanity project.

aug 29, 2025, 11:42 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Andrew Rivas @rivasad.bsky.social

The rules and regulations we have in place in California that allow unlimited litigation for CEQA on *transit projects* are the reason CAHSR is decades delayed (among others). If McCourt wants to spend *private money* to build a method of transit that replaces cars, we should all let him!

aug 29, 2025, 11:46 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kierkegaarden Cop @joshsteich.bsky.social

If he wants to build it AND fund its operation, that’s one thing, but (contra Roger Rabbit) the reason we lost streetcars is they were built to sell suburbs & developers stopped paying to maintain them after the lots were sold. We don’t have to make that mistake again!

aug 29, 2025, 11:58 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Brainspore @brainspore.bsky.social

There are many legitimate public concerns created when a project like this is built in a community that go well beyond who is paying for it. Traffic impacts & gentrification in Chinatown, noise & light pollution, the privacy of people living under the thing etc. are all worth serious consideration.

aug 29, 2025, 11:56 pm • 1 0 • view