But, but, but, the Founding Fathers wanted everyone to have an assault weapon… www.nytimes.com/2025/06/09/h...
But, but, but, the Founding Fathers wanted everyone to have an assault weapon… www.nytimes.com/2025/06/09/h...
This happened in MI the other day, but when I did a search for the article, you wouldn't believe how many other similar incidents came up. www.freep.com/story/news/l...
MI has actually strengthened gun laws in recent years, including safe storage laws.
Exactly as we relearn why the founding fathers didn’t want a large standing army but, sought to solidify the ability to form a well regulated militia of ordinary citizens. It’s no coincidence that the French Garde Nationale under Lafayette (yes, that one) and the Bill of Rights are both from 1789.
😡
Imagine 23k kids dead by gun average age 14! In 13 years 1999-2012 in USA no War? Ukraine in an all out war 2/2022 Russia invades! 700 kids killed! 2500 injured? More but? USA no war #1 under 19 killer the Gun! 1750 dead a year By gun USA! Injured 4700 a year! www.nytimes.com/2025/06/09/h...
A year? Insanity yes we have 10x the people but we are not at war! Just too many Guns with no safety training and Permitting? Insanity! God Help The USA!
No surprise there. Looser gun laws=more guns=more people getting shot. Simple math.
And the founders absolutely did NOt want everyone armed. They practiced strict gun control in cities and were quite clear that the "well regulated militia" was not applied to every individual being armed. "A man with a rifle out hunting could not be said to be "bearing arms""(paraphrasing)
Well, they need that assault weapon in case the tyrannical dictator comes along that tries to put Federal forces in the streets or something like that. You know, militarizing the cities, they would not stand for it. Patriots. And Jesus and stuff.
Especially the children! www.bing.com/videos/river...
DUH ... 👉 No 💩 !! (Thanks for the post, Joyce 💙 = ❣️)
Trump Admin Response: Well, that won't be true once we cancel the funds for these studies, fire everyone who gathers the data, and stop counting the dead kids! Problem solved.
Semiautomatic rifles are soon to be called "prayer rods."
NYT headline just stating the bleeding obvious there
And water is wet… 🙄
Brought to you by the same organization that forgot it needs guns to fight tyranical government
I spent four years in the Marines and another three in MD National Guard. My older sister gave me an AR15 for my 65th BD. Before my stroke, my friends and I used at a local range. We were engineers, doctors, and scientists (men and women). Explain that. Semper Fi ❤️
"not all nazis were bad !!"
That's a trompism!
Thank you for your service.
Don't ruin their echo chamber.
Were you and your friends black?
Whaaaat? Why that just makes no sense. Wait. It makes perfect sense. The NRA knew it. The Republicans knew it.🤬
Wow! That is such a shock! How sad. Maybe we should pray for them?! 😫😫😫😝😝😝😵💫😵💫😵💫
If only they hadn’t eaten all those ultra-processed foods, this tragedy might have been averted.
But I thought the way to reduce gun violence was for everyone to get more guns?? This math ain't mathin, so I guess this is where someone yells "fake news!" 😑
the price of Freedumb
I live in Gainesville Georgia which is an hour North of Atlanta. The daily reports of gun violence deaths in the Atlanta area is sickening. Where is the Republican outrage regarding this daily deadly slaughter? Oh, I forgot, it doesn’t fit their narrative, so the daily bloodbath continues.
I'm shocked!!
There is no well regulated militia in this country!
But....you might be needing them now to protect yourself from our own government. Responsible gun owners don't kill innocent children or other humans. They should always be used to protect from being slaughtered by a rogue government. Well regulated militia.I have so many questions on who regulates.
I'm shocked.
A musket for everyone then. 🤷♀️
Open it up for thim on government leadership that is unconstitutional with the second amendment so they have somebody let their aggressions out on other than their classmates..
Some of us still remember the words about a well-regulated militia. Rs have been misreading this obvious thing for decades now. And here we are.
And, tax free silencers for them
Oh no. We can't extort Americans.
This reminds me of the time I did CPR on a child who shot himself in the face with his Dad's gun. Been a while. Kid would be an adult now if he got to grow up.
In other news, states that allow kids to play with matches have more fires.
Funny how it’s also the same states that have destroyed reproductive rights. Guess they want to keep enough supply so they don’t run out of targets.
The Founding Fathers lived at a time when guns needed a rock to make them go boom. They never imaged bump stocks.
Hey USA - guess how many mass shootingsl we have in the UK? And guess why the number is "zero" It's not rocket science, is it?
The whole rationale/lie that the 2nd amendment is needed to, “break glass in case of govt.” is clearly untrue. Because Don’t tread on me Yanks, are not turning out across the street from ICE Razzias bearing arms. The Land of the “I will comply” hits a little different, doesn’t it?
Considering all the lost lives in red states due to Republican politics, it has not materially changed the balance of maga voters in this country. 🤷🏻♂️
No surprise here!
Fucking morons
...so are you saying that the bad guys are gop who hold no accountability for guns??
One of the many mistakes Democrats make is not pointing out, every day, that violent crime is proportionally much higher in red states (and in rural areas) than in blue urban ones. But instead we get constant images of violence in big cities.
Because, while it’s true what you say, it’s a difficult message to get across to the morons that swing vote.
It can't work if it's not tried. Democrats aren't willing to play hardball because they are too afraid of offending some of their voters (or potential voters). Republicans don't worry about that, which is one of the reasons they often win.
Yeah, democrats are good at governing and really bad at messaging. The opposite is the case for republicans. But honestly, I imagine the best case to be made to the morons in the middle is a selfish fiscal one.
Do you know how incoherent it is to cry fascism while trying to further restrict gun rights? Only the (secret) police and the illegally activated military should have AR15s 🫨
Now if everyone had their own piece of field artillery they could defend themselves against the assault weapons.
But the trans students who want to join in high school sports!!!!!!!
The founding fathers loved slavery - is it that much of a stretch to imagine that they were ok with the odd kid being murdered if it let everyone keep guns?
Dunno but starting to think it’s Darwinism on steroids.
Surprise surprise.
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Sadly the kids are collateral damage
They don't care. Good christians and all...
Wow. Totally a surprise.
Who would have thought.
all research projects and studies indicate that conservatives are nothing but evil rotten burdens on humanity and should be nowhere near power of any kind. conservatives also know they are nearly useless in every way that matters and so they became the fire fighters who start the fires... needless
So many goddamned guns, yet, pedophiles are running the government and no bullets fly. Weird. What a fucking christian place.
Who needs kids?! Jesus loves guns! Pew! Pew!
there were no requirements for cops--like Uvalkde and TX-- to have enough courage to save kids
Great news for PRO-LIFE "not my gun" crowd.
Not ok!
Now the New York Times matter? Yeah ok. If this continues bet many are going to wish they had one to defend themselves. Criminals don't follow laws unless they make victims easy prey. Those are the one's they pay attention to.
Gun violence is the leading cause of children deaths yet it made no appearance in the MAHA document
Duh ... not surprising at all.
🙄 derp...
👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼
Muzzle loaders should be the only legal firearm allowed!!
The only ones who benefit from US promiscuous gun regime are radical militias, crime professionals, crime amateurs, and the gun business. But that what SCOTUS wants. Fascism, street mayhem & general reign of terror for the 99%. It’s original intent, you know.
It's impressive that any research into the subject was able to get done. I thought the NRA had, at least Health Professionals, muzzled from being able to discuss guns in homes with children.
Who could have known 😤
Duh
“Tree of Liberty” something something “toddlers”.
No one could have anticipated that more guns would result in more shootings
The founding fathers wanted every American to have their own Deathstar because there is nothing to ban them in the constitution.
So they want more babies unless they are older than 5 years old. Then if they want to shoot themselves 🤷🏼♂️🙄
I have to wonder, what did they think would happen.
and it could play a huge part in upcoming protests....
Do we really need studies to know the outcome of loosening gun laws?
It’s sad that these people love their guns more than the kids.
"These people" sounds like maga.
The founding fathers didn't have a clue as to the types of weapons we have today. Shotguns & single shot rifles were it.
Uhmn,…Antonin Scalia wanted everyone to have an assault weapon. Clarence Thomas concurred. Don’t get it twisted. MAGA! Making Americans Gun(toters)Again 👊🇺🇸😳
Republican voters do not care. Kids are raped in their churches and they do nothing but deflect to drag queens who do not rape or groom kids. This is about Republican voters and their acceptance of nonsensical violence.
…I can’t believe the study said that
It's the New York Times. Suddenly when it fits someone agenda it matters and becomes gospel. Sound familiar? MAGA. Imagine what this current administration would do with an unarmed citizenry? Current events... CA.
I’m not sure what your point is?
That clearly is the problem
No, really, I’m not sure what you’re saying.
I'll put it this way... I agree with your original comment.
Fair enough haha
We must vote against every R on the ballot, from top all the way to dog catcher. For at least the foreseeab future.
Red states value fetuses because they value the control of women. They have no value for children otherwise, and they prove it daily.
Suprise
So much for the sanctity of life. Someone’s right to murder people is greater than another person’s right to live.
Too bad we don't support scientific studies in the US anymore. #maha
Clearly not enough of the children are armed yet.
Yeah, except "assault weapons" of the day were knives, swords and tomahawks!
The Founding Fathers were a bloodthirsty bunch and wanted everyone to kill masses of innocent people. Evil bastards! 😉
And a tank, bazooka, flame thrower, land mine, rocket launcher, etc.
Of course they did. No brainer… and that’s exactly what these states are full of: brainless people.
It has been argued that when Justice Scalia was busy creating his interpretation of 2A, he chiseled out the individual right to own guns,(that was never there before) which he invented, just as Justice Roberts invented total immunity for the president. It does not exist anywhere in the constitution.
States do have a right to regulate firearms, which even Scalia admitted to, in his opinion, stating that the ruling did not mean that 2A gave someone the right to any gun, anywhere, (as hard as the merchants of gun profits and death to America’s children, try to twist it to mean.)
In fact, the propaganda weavers of gun deaths into gun rights, like to leave out the most critical phrase that explains 2A quite clearly: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state…”
Those arguing against Scalia’s version of 2A, suggested the manipulation of 2A into an individual right to a gun, was a fraud, perpetrated on the American people by the gun lobby, - that clearly appears to be for blood profits, at expense to our democracy,
especially for those communities we fail to protect from gun trafficking, which the states of California, and New York are addressing through their efforts focusing on the questions the press never asks: Who supplied the crime gun? How was the gun obtained?
Justice Warren Burger and other scholars (Joseph Ellis) explain it quite clearly, arguing our security/military protections are now organized into a standing army/military,
which didn’t formally yet exist as we know it today, back when the writing of 2A was being negotiated into the bill of rights betwn the standing Army supporters, and the local-militia supporters,
(where some states wanted to be ready to protect themselves from British attacks, not being convinced a standing army could arrive in time, they argued to maintain their militias’ readiness for battle against the British),
- the context being: WELL REGULATED MILITIAS, which the NRA likes to ignore,- (making military use of force against civilian-citizens & their rights to address grievances w/ their government *peacefully through protest*, a serious violation by Trump, & perhaps a crime? m.youtube.com/shorts/LNn_A...
Well, colour me shocked.