Try critical thinking. Yours is the voice of privilege. What about those who can’t get or replace ID or vote in person due to cost, disability, lack of transportation, children to care for, jobs they can’t take time off from, etc.? That’s what AI saying.

not sure why you sent this to me. I understand all that I've lived quite a bit of it.

Learn how to follow a thread. You are claiming AI is wrong about voter ID. I was giving you FACTS about why it is right.

I never said it was wrong about voter ID. you're putting words in my mouth.

You were trying to say it in false even after the person said it tracks. Why criticize someone who did what you want?

I only made that one comment.

Exactly. That one comment that implied that we shouldn’t trust what the AI said about voter ID when, in fact, it was accurate.

Except in this case, it’s correct about what groups are disproportionately affected by voter restrictions.

So is any research paper done by actual people. Relying on AI for all your answers makes you dumb.

So provide us with research that proves it wrong. Even the extreme far right Heritage Foundation couldn’t find any need for voter ID.

That’s both a very uneducated response, and not what either I or the OP posited. It’s also a distraction from the real point about the new red lines that the GOP are trying to use legislate racism into law.

no it's not. it's been proven that using AI causes cognitive decline.

I keep finding some variation of “maybe” if overused. That’s true of any technology. The invention of books caused us to be dumber because we don’t memorize things any more. The invention of adding machines caused us to be dumber because most people don’t do complex math in their heads any more.

Source?

MIT study time.com/7295195/ai-c...

Look at the title “May be eroding”. Not proven.