It has nothing to do with evidence. It has to do with that the legal requirements are and what is necessary for a plaintiff to satisfy them.
Replies
IT BETTER HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH EVIDENCE OR IT IS "HEARSAY" BOY
aug 26, 2025, 10:05 am • 0 0 • view
Neither, Soarky, it has to do with proving each of the elements of defamation are. Do you know what they are without looking them up? BTW, you Caps Lock is stuck.
aug 26, 2025, 10:10 am • 2 0 • view
One of those elements requires a false statement of fact. Under the law, statements of opinion or “rhetorical hyperbole” is not actionable as a defamatory statement.
aug 26, 2025, 10:12 am • 2 0 • view
And most often, judges will determine whether a statement is a statement of opinion or rhetorical hybervole based on the statements themselves. They don’t need to weigh other evidence.
aug 26, 2025, 10:19 am • 2 0 • view
BTW, have you been under a rock for almost three weeks? We had this conversation weeks ago.
aug 26, 2025, 10:13 am • 2 0 • view
This one is pretty clearly not all there
aug 26, 2025, 10:22 am • 4 0 • view
Welp someone got into the tussin at 3 in the morning and felt sparky I had forgotten this one. They went stale.
aug 26, 2025, 10:29 am • 2 0 • view
Someone turned their bot on after 3 weeks.
aug 26, 2025, 10:32 am • 3 0 • view
I dunno...I feel like a bot would be better then this...this has the energy of a drunk boomer or a teen who big bawls talked into drinking a tub of tussin at a late night rager. Just kinda sad and flaccidly angry.
aug 26, 2025, 10:43 am • 3 0 • view