avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

It says no such thing:

image
aug 26, 2025, 5:12 pm • 3 0

Replies

avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

image image
aug 26, 2025, 6:20 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Maccniph @maccniph.bsky.social

EXACTLY

image
aug 28, 2025, 8:47 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

Wrong. The very language you underlined is all talking about the role courts play in Maritime Law. It is not saying that Maritime Law is the same law that applies to events on land.

aug 28, 2025, 8:50 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

Do you not speak English? Because anyone who does should realize that language does not mean what you claim. FFS.

aug 28, 2025, 8:50 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Julie Faenza @juliemfaenza.bsky.social

OMG. I. Am. Deceased. You realize that says that the federal courts INTERPRET maritime law, right? Not that they operate under maritime law?

aug 28, 2025, 8:49 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

It’s amazing how people can completely misunderstand basic English. It’s not like there is any legal-ese in that portion. Plus it has to be interpreted in light of what the definition is above.

aug 28, 2025, 8:56 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Maccniph @maccniph.bsky.social

This for your pea brain, says and describes what it is, NOT HOW OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM USES IT AGAINST CITIZENS

aug 28, 2025, 8:49 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

The judicial system doesn’t use maritime law against its citizens unless it involves their interactions with the employment, transport, etc. ON THE SEA. Any claim otherwise is completely baseless and idiotic.

aug 28, 2025, 8:52 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

I’m going to mute you because your idiocy and ignorance is actually painful to deal with.

aug 28, 2025, 8:53 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Julie Faenza @juliemfaenza.bsky.social

LOL They don't use it against citizens. Unless the citizens have an issue arising under maritime law.

aug 28, 2025, 8:50 pm • 0 0 • view