Therefore due ro the above, we know that the Doctrine application of “brodcast stations” (of which cable channels are not) was an exception to 1A and that it could never be applied constitutionally to any other medium.
Therefore due ro the above, we know that the Doctrine application of “brodcast stations” (of which cable channels are not) was an exception to 1A and that it could never be applied constitutionally to any other medium.
And finally 1A does guarantee free speech in the way you claim, asserting that an outlet being a propaganda machine “stifles free speech.” 1A only protects from government infringement of free speech. Private entities cannot violate 1A. As the cases above show, they can’t be required to …
to allow “free speech.” Doing so is the violation of 1A.