The courts were the arbiter and ruled a) he failed to state a claim due to 230 against Facebook and b) he had not standing to sue the government that 230 was unconstitutional. He was given his chance to appeal and he did so and lost. He was given due process and is just butt hurt he lost.
And the government has every right to pass 230 or any other law that does tort reform to give immunity. There is nothing unconstitutional about that.
But what will the 4th Circuit and the doj will do if he bring that constitutional challenge of 230 on that court ?
Asked and answered. Any such case is barred by rea judicata. I’ve repeatedly told you this.
But fyk doesn,t care about rea judicata He will bring his constitutional challenge this year he has said that clearly on a twitter space so what will happen when he will bring that suit ?
The courts care about res judicata, Pinky. What Fyk cares about is irrelevant. As I’ve told you, his case will be dismissed.
These are not difficult things to understand.
Fyk didn’t care about meeting the requirements of how he had to frame his writ of certiorari or what FRCP 5.1 really meant. The courts did which is why he lost.
How many times dows Fyk have to be proven wrong until you finally think “I shouldn’t take a single thing he says seriously? Because he has been wrong about everything and not right once.
And if he tries this suit, it’s very likely that Facebook will seek sanctions against his attorney for bringing a frivolous lawsuit.
And what will the doj do if he tries that suit ? She will obliged to defend section 230 Since fyk sued the government and facebook. And fyk will challenge the constitutionality of Section 230 in this upcoming suit
they will move to dismiss.
And writ of certiorari is only require for scotus right brian ?
Pinky, I was talking about the writ he filed in the spring and how he framed it completely wrong as I explained it to to you then. I was pointing to 2 examples where Fyk showed he didn’t care about the law and it had no relevance.
That’s should have been obvious by my use of past tense verbs like “didn’t”, “did” and “lost.”
But he is not going to go to scotus he his going to go to the 3rd Circuit
No, he would first file a case in the district court. And why does that change a single thing I said?
Do you think that the doj will be forced to deal with
Deal with what?