avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

And why would the DOJ “side with Fyk?”

aug 29, 2025, 11:46 am • 1 0

Replies

avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

And again it doesn’t even get to that point because the case gets dismissed on a motion to dismiss based on res judicata and lack of standing.

aug 29, 2025, 11:48 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

FFS, Fyk has already been told that suing the federal gov't on this claim is uselss because there is no relief the gov't can give him on this.

image
aug 29, 2025, 1:32 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

Thus, even if the DOJ were to "side with Fyk," his lawsuit would still be useless. A judicial declaration that Section 230 unconstitutional by a district court is not binding on any parties other than the ones present in the case. And Facebook would not be in the case by the time such ...

aug 29, 2025, 1:40 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

declaration would be made. And the DoJ has no authority or role with regard to Section 230 and any action by the DoJ would have no legal impact on anyone else. As the Court noted the first time he sued the gov't. Which is why he is a moron.

aug 29, 2025, 1:42 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Brian Kemper @bwkemper.bsky.social

Correction, it's one of plethora of reasons that he is a moron.

aug 29, 2025, 1:43 pm • 2 0 • view