Says the guy that doesn’t realize that saying someone based upon disclosed facts is a “murderer” is an opinion. Or that Rittenhouse has an excellent defamation claim when he absolutely does not. Which is why he never sued anyone for it.
Replies
There is a huge difference between someone stating an opinion vs. stating something as a fact. These people are not giving an opinion that they think Kyle is a murderer, not what they stated. Rather they are claiming he is a murderer, and with no evidence to support it.
sep 1, 2025, 1:31 pm • 0 0 • view
You don't have a right to intentionally lie about and spread baseless claims about others, the laws of this nation afford you no such rights. Its called libel clueless. Disclosed facts? You people are claiming he's a murderer, yet provided no evidence at all to support your claims.
sep 1, 2025, 1:23 pm • 0 0 • view
It’s not an “intentional lie” to say express an opinion that he is a murderer. And everyone has a 1A right to express that. The law is very clear on that. It would be an “intentional lie” to claim that he was convicted by a jury for murder. But you can’t tell the difference between those …
sep 1, 2025, 1:32 pm • 1 0 • view
They are not expressing opinions, they are claiming he is a murderer, not that they think he's one. Stop lying you degenerate piece of 💩
sep 1, 2025, 1:34 pm • 0 0 • view
Well that's cause he's a murderer
sep 1, 2025, 1:46 pm • 0 0 • view
statements. And you don’t know what “disclosed facts” means legally. There are disclosed facts that can lead to someone expressing an opinion that he committed murder, even if it’s a moral opinion and not a legal one. For instance, he admitted to bringing the weapon and lkilling …
sep 1, 2025, 1:34 pm • 1 0 • view
You are truly deranged. It seems you have total disregard for the rights of others and the laws of this nation. You don't even try to hide it.
sep 1, 2025, 1:55 pm • 0 0 • view
No, I am arguing what the law is and what is relevant in the case or not. the only one deranged statements is you. Like claiming a “not guilty” verdict legally equals innocence. No one with a brain would make such statement.
sep 1, 2025, 1:58 pm • 1 0 • view
people. Those are “disclosed facts.” Everything presented by the prosecution is a “disclosed fact.” FFS, Pinky, peope can express an opinion that abortion providers are murderers even if they operate in states where abortion is legal. Because it is their opinion. This is some basic level shit
sep 1, 2025, 1:36 pm • 1 0 • view
Then tell him to sue me for libel.
sep 1, 2025, 1:35 pm • 0 0 • view