Between vote margins and state laws, recounts were only legally available in Michigan and Nevada. Suspicions and vague forensic analysis wouldn’t have changed that. None are available now, so there's nowhere to go with this effort. 3/
Replies
The elections were audited in all states, comparing paper ballots to final tallies. (Most randomly select precincts to check) None of the audits found issues. In most of the swing states, it was Democratic officials overseeing the process. 4/
mar 24, 2025, 7:04 pm • 0 0 • view
The voting officials were very aware that the software for some of the machines had been improperly shared, and in the case of Georgia publicly addressed the situation by increasing physical security around the master device to prevent possible manipulation. 5/
mar 24, 2025, 7:05 pm • 0 0 • view
With the exception of the flaw that Georgia was taking extra security to prevent, any hack of voting equipment would necessitate hands-on access to every machine involved. That would require bypassing different security processes in hundreds of precincts, most in Democratically managed locations. 6/
mar 24, 2025, 7:07 pm • 0 0 • view
A conspiracy of this magnitude would require a large number of people, and the more people necessary for a conspiracy to work, the less likely it is to be kept secret. For instance, we know about the improper sharing of voter system software because the people involved couldn’t keep it secret. 7/
mar 24, 2025, 7:07 pm • 0 0 • view
I'll stop here. What frustrates me most is that this is being used to criticize Kamala, saying she's too feckless to fight. I resent those who denigrate her reputation this way. She didn't pursue it because it didn't happen, and she certainly doesn't deserve criticism for accepting the facts. 8/8
mar 24, 2025, 7:14 pm • 0 0 • view
This attitude will most definitely ensure we will never have free and fair elections again. Check out the ETA website and read more reports. The data is not normal voting data. Get involved!
mar 25, 2025, 4:24 pm • 0 0 • view
I checked out the website and watched the video. I read the reports. I’ve also read material from people with far more election security expertise than any of these individuals, and they all agree this is just as delusional as DJT’s claims about 2020. It’s a distraction from real voter suppression.
mar 25, 2025, 5:27 pm • 0 0 • view
statescoop.com/cybersecurit...
mar 25, 2025, 6:00 pm • 0 0 • view
Everyone is focusing on the security after votes have been cast. However, there was opportunity to steal votes prior to casting votes in PA. There were many shady R operatives focusing on communities that don’t typically vote e.g. Amish). I think they could have intercepted mail in ballots.
mar 25, 2025, 6:21 pm • 0 0 • view
Or sat with folks when they received their mail in ballot. I am only saying this as a life-long resident of PA, knowing typical behavior patterns. I can’t be convinced that the Amish were swayed Scott Presler.
mar 25, 2025, 6:23 pm • 1 0 • view
There was a huge focus on security *before* the election. Google "2024 election security" and you'll find lots of articles describing the many organizations and hundreds (if not thousands) of security experts working at every level. Besides, Kamala lost by 120,000 votes; there are only 89,000 Amish.
mar 25, 2025, 6:30 pm • 0 0 • view
Elon Musk spent 6 weeks in PA prior to the election. Per Trump, “he really knows those voting computers.”
mar 25, 2025, 4:22 pm • 0 0 • view
1) DJT doesn’t know how to turn on his own computer, so it doesn’t take much to impress him; 2) Musk doesn’t know that much about them, either; 3) Pennsylvania uses a dozen different types of voting machines and none are connected to the Internet. How would Musk or his team hack them?
mar 25, 2025, 5:58 pm • 0 0 • view
The kids working for Musk sure seem to know a lot about computers.
mar 25, 2025, 6:04 pm • 0 0 • view
Actually, I'd say the opposite. Their list of fraud "discoveries" includes listing the same contracts multiple times, listing programs ended as far back as the GW Bush administration, and reporting numbers off by three decimal points. These are not highly capable people.
mar 25, 2025, 6:19 pm • 1 0 • view
Source?
mar 25, 2025, 4:14 pm • 0 0 • view
Not true. They are asking every county for the data. If the county refuses, they will sue for it. Thus the funding needed for lawyers.
mar 25, 2025, 4:20 pm • 0 0 • view