Everything is classified. Random lunch plans are classified. There is overwhelming bipartisan consensus that we classify way too much meaningless correspondence and data that is already publicly available. The idea that this wouldn’t be classified is so funny
I’ll take Goldbergs word for it!! 👍
“defer you to”? Dumb, dumber, dumber yet, even dumber . . .
It's "refer" you to and I "defer" to the Sec of Defense...
Their lying is so bad and inconsistent. #kakistocracy
Argument is that despite there being overclassification issues, if there's anything that SHOULD be classified, this is info fits the bill. Your framing, while fun, concedes to them the ability to argue that even if this was classified it's only because we overclassify shit that doesn't need it.
Living in this country has become unbearably embarrassing
Jeeezzzzzz she’s such a liar
Regardless of what one thinks of Goldberg v Hegseth, the only reason why Goldberg is even privy to this information is because he was added to the Signal chat. He didn’t need to add a word to it; he could have just taken screen shots and posted them without comment and the facts would be the same.
If you burn a DVD with unclassified info that you you need on the high side for a report, it is treated as classified from that moment on. Security is very annoying and inconvenient. Us regular DoD minions follow the rules day in and day out because our employment status and clearance depend on it.
Umm, I trust Jeffrey Goldberg over Hegseth, 100 percent.
Bondi is worse than Huckleberry Sanders was! Holy shit 🙄
You confused her with Leavitt. I think that their appearance is deliberately cloned though.
I trust Jeffrey Goldberg. His ethics should serve as an example to us all. Thank you Mr. Goldberg for exposing the truth.
There's a juicy story on Mr. e. and his companies taking Dark Money from foreign governments - to expose game ??
She sounds like such an idiot. They should have not been using that platform.
The mere fact that they were even having a discussion was classified. These people are the only DEI (didn't earn it) hires in America.
True story: in the 1950s, the Department of Labor classified information on the amount of peanut butter purchased by the Defense Department, on the grounds that it could be used to estimate the size of the military.
bsky.app/profile/bigb...
It is funny that she asks “who do you belive most…?” Well…🤔😁
👆👍💙
Classification status is a red herring. www.nbcnews.com/politics/tru...
Jeffrey Goldberg
Did anyone nominated by Trump actually go through and properly get a security clearance? I remember reading at the time of many nominations that Trump was basically just waiving it. I had a Secret clearance. I’ve filled out the packet for TS but got out of the Army first. I’ve been a reference for 2
defer?
Someone should remind the blonde dei hire that fox news was sued for almost a billion dollars for lying to the public,why would anyone hire a wannabe newsman from a convicted lying newstation and fire a general whom obviously more qualified, can't be because the whole maga administration bought jobs
No!
They're in court arguing that publicly available flight details are classified, but the knowledge that the United States collapsed a building on civilians is just office banter. Clowns.
A US Military Veteran calls bullshit ! I know the answer…
*Spoiler: They are
Every Republican has the power to declassify things with the power of his mind.
We do not trust the Secretary of Defense.
This story has legs. Stick on it, press. DO NOT GET DISTRACTED. Hire more journos but every press avail needs to be about Signal until everyone save Goldberg is fired.
In my Federal career, I've seen magazine articles stamped "Secret" and political appointees writing articles for public consumption that included classified information not identified as classified. But Hegseth's explanation is just an old-fashioned cover-up because he got caught.
She’s lying?
Trump says he can declassify things just by thinking about them. I wonder why he hasn’t attempted that defense yet
They believe there are no such things as facts. There's just our story and their story. Truth doesn't enter into the conversation. "if you are among the faithful, you believe us".
Do you trust a secretary of defence or a democrat and anti-trump. Dah, that's a no-brainer 😂
A) The question answers itself. B) Why is this a function of trusting Goldberg? The text record is valid and not in dispute so why does his credibility have anything to do with this issue?
That is world class Karen right there. I may have to nominate Karoline Levitt for the Karen of the year award.
This is so sickening. It's like a really really sick joke. A very horrifying terrifying sick sick sick joke.
Uh, we certainly trust no one in this government Goldberg has the actual goods on them. Belief has nothing to do with it. FACTS. It’s FACTS
We have an administration full of incompetent, immoral, drug addled, alcoholic, putin loving dip shits running the country, great job MAGAts🤬
Lunch? What? When you have a sandwich is now classified?
yes, it is the default
Fair one. You made me laugh. Have a great day.
We don’t have a secretary of defense! We have secretary of incompetence.
I don't think launch times are publicly available.
Leavitt seems to be confused. These aren’t Goldberg’s words. They’re the words of SoD.
Weird how she didn’t mention the waiver Trump had to sign for Pete because he was so unqualified
Woah. The her verbal emphasis on GOLDBERG is telling.
The next question should be “will the Sec of defence be sharing future attack plans publicly prior to their implementation and if not why”
I'd just outright ask for the plans for the next week and dare her to answer that it's classified.
“Defer you?”
deflect + refer = defer, in newspeak
They would have the highest classification possible if this occurred under a Democrat.
Maybe they were confusing lunch times with launch times.
Sounds like a great premise for a kid’s TV show. Sid and Marty Krofft should jump on that!
Never stop lying. Never answer anything.
Fuck no, we don’t trust ANYONE in that administration
Funny is not the right word. TERRIFYING is much more accurate.
As is the idea that this involves trusting Goldberg at all. There are screenshots that they're not even contesting are authentic. What do I need to trust Goldberg about?