avatar
Mark Copelovitch @mcopelov.bsky.social

Again, if we make it through this, every one of these imperial presidency delegation laws - created by both parties since WWII - needs to go. They rested on shared norms & rolls of duct tape that no longer bind together the American polity, because one of our two parties has collapsed into fascism:

jul 30, 2025, 2:23 pm • 312 96

Replies

avatar
Tahar 🇺🇦 🇵🇸 🇺🇳 🇪🇺 @rochaa.bsky.social

But since the Special One showed little regard for the law, what keeps the Next Special One from just disregarding the new law? We set a bad precedent, which will be very hard to break.

jul 30, 2025, 3:01 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Mark Copelovitch @mcopelov.bsky.social

Indeed. An awful set of incentives.

jul 30, 2025, 3:05 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Mark Copelovitch @mcopelov.bsky.social

👇

jul 30, 2025, 3:17 pm • 14 4 • view
avatar
Mark Copelovitch @mcopelov.bsky.social

Cold War laws, like the IEEPA & Section 232, with vague, undefined clauses allowing the President to be a Mad King by declaring a "national emergency" or invoking "national security" totally need to go. We can't do that anymore, because we can't assume all parties are committed to norms & democracy.

jul 30, 2025, 3:15 pm • 14 5 • view
avatar
Timothy Burke @timothyburke.bsky.social

Everybody who ever warned against the danger of these laws has been vindicated. We stocked the federal government full of statutory weapons useful for someone seeking authoritarian power and now the armory has been fully raided.

jul 30, 2025, 2:47 pm • 4 1 • view
avatar
LD Hornung @ldhornung.bsky.social

Trump only uses the laws that benefit him. He breaks the rest.

jul 30, 2025, 3:25 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Somewhere in Seattle @charlie62.bsky.social

We will need to pass new laws that no longer depend on “norms” and the “spirit”!of the law to prevent an imperial president presidency. We will need a new law that puts an IG in place that cannot be fired by the president without congressional approval.

jul 30, 2025, 2:33 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Worldvind @trinvin.bsky.social

Not a political scientist but there's a problem no legislation could have fixed — two terms of a man who is barely literate, severely incompetent and who suffers from delusions of grandeur. The problem? A White racist electorate.

jul 30, 2025, 5:21 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
princa.bsky.social @princa.bsky.social

The problem is that like rights, once power is given, it is next to impossible to reclaim. What president is going to sign a bill that puts limits on the power they currently have?

jul 30, 2025, 3:20 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
tonyjoyce.bsky.social @tonyjoyce.bsky.social

A better president the current asshat.

jul 30, 2025, 6:34 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Leslie Talbot @leslietalbot.bsky.social

I wouldn't put it past this SCOTUS to declare any sort of legislation around this to be unconstitutional...so I guess it'll have to be passed when a Democratic president is in office because then they might be more inclined to restrain them.

jul 30, 2025, 3:18 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mk @mkology.bsky.social

We have to make a future Trump illegal since the honor system means nothing when dealing with dishonorable people.

jul 30, 2025, 3:37 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
scohoe.bsky.social @scohoe.bsky.social

We should have executed any slave holders after the civil war, even the ones in office, I don't know what that correlates to now, but lets do that too.

jul 30, 2025, 2:25 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Rick H @lfeatfan.bsky.social

The Trump administrations view is that the military is there to control the people. Any pretext whether real or fabricated can be used to threaten the use of military force, which is particularly true with Trump.

jul 30, 2025, 3:54 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Vbreadman @vbregman.bsky.social

jul 30, 2025, 3:34 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Peter Louwe @peterlouwe.bsky.social

More than one party. It's your country. Gone.

jul 30, 2025, 3:53 pm • 0 0 • view