I did. Most of what I said are about things that aren't in this clip. I agree with them that Israel's policies are harmful to Jews, but I was uncomfortable with how they centered it. I don't disagree with the substance of what they said.
I did. Most of what I said are about things that aren't in this clip. I agree with them that Israel's policies are harmful to Jews, but I was uncomfortable with how they centered it. I don't disagree with the substance of what they said.
This clip is actually a part where it's not about "Israel's policies are bad for Jews." It's about how immoral supporting Israel is, which is an appropriate centering topic. But the longer interview is much more focused on how Jews are harmed by Israel's actions, his wife especially.
Yes. Exactly that. If he/they are using the 'harm to Jews' to catalyse Jews to 'wake up', then I could be more tolerant, but he/they aren't. I agree that it is 'harming' Jews worldwide, but it's the perception of Jews as perpetual 'victims' which is being harmed (mostly). No religious group
is, nor has been, MORE protected (in modern history), NONE. That's what bothers me about this interview and Olmert etc.
Same. Exactly the same. I may screenshot your replies and plagiarise them, they are better articulated than mine.