Misogyny isn't "in the room" - it's in your words. If you had a real argument, you wouldn't need to hide behind insults and tantrums. Try harder. "They let this happen"? What exactly is "this"? You're yelling into the void with no facts, no clarity, and no point - just noise.
You claim my arguments don't have a point because you are swamped in libber propaganda that's built from the ground up to dismiss and ignore the vaild failures of the Democratic Party. Don't play stupid. "This" clearly refers to the outwardly fascist policy and enforcement of these policies.
If woman want equal credit for the good that they have brought to the world, that doesn't mean they get off scot free for the absolute fuck ups of women they have equally caused. You just use the blanket insult so you feel justified in ignoring the points I bring up.
Ah, the classic 'if women want equality, they better own every bad woman ever' argument. Yawn, what a tired take. You’re not bringing up points, you're flinging generalizations and then acting shocked when people don’t salute them.
That's how it works, if you want to be taken seriously, you can claim responsibility for the good, you have to take responsibility for your fuck ups.
If equality means owning every bad actor from your group, then I guess every man should answer for every violent, corrupt, or abusive one too. Equality is about being treated as individuals, not scapegoats. Your argument was never about fairness. Just deflection.
"If equality means owning every bad actor from your group, then I guess every man should answer for every violent, corrupt, or abusive one too..." Yes. 100% that's how a just society should exist. Now, there's an issue about the level of punishment but if American prison system
actually functioned as a true rehabilitation system and not as a means to keep slavery alive we wouldn't have 3/4 of repeat offenders
You hijacked my point, twisted it, then veered into prison reform like we’re in a totally different debate. You’re not engaging, you’re dodging. If you have a real argument, make it. Otherwise, stop using mine as a springboard for your TED Talk.
I didn't hijack anything. Your argument was incredibly weak. And I wad just adding context to the extent of beliefs. Like a person normally dose.
You butchered the grammar and the point. “Dose” instead of “does”? Really? If you can’t respect the basics of language, maybe don’t declare someone’s argument weak. Clarity starts with syntax — and you’re not even in the game.
Oh hey, look who crawled back, swinging with the same tired takes, just now sprinkled with a little extra conspiracy glitter. Screaming 'propaganda' doesn’t make your point deep, just louder. And telling me not to 'play stupid'? Please. If I wanted to do that, I’d just start agreeing with you