Man.. you magats really are just allergic to information, aren't you? Buddy boy, child, they have links to their sources. It isn't anecdotal. It's actual, you know, science. Your source is barely more than two dozen out of a pool of what, 200,000? Over a course of years. Cherry pick much?

You cherry picked an article I couldn’t find searching trans women in sports. My article was the first that showed up from a publication that is biased towards trans women in sports like yours is. There is no “science”. Your article and opinions appeal to emotion almost exclusively.

Kiddo, you don't even know what "cherry picked" means clearly. Stop abusing the term. I picked a well sourced article, you picked one that is literally someone's opinion. And your failings to find an article that was one of the first ones on google is a failing on your part, nothing to do with me.

Yeah because who got medals that year or not is very opinionated.

29 medals. Out of 150,000. That is the literal definition of cherry picking. Pay attention and you might learn something about critical thinking, despite yourself.

No not really.

Yeah, I figured learning was beyond you.