AGREED!!!

And there never will be a right moment for it. The threat of a fascist leader aint gonna end with Trump. It's always been there and it will always continue to be there. It's the whole reason the 2nd amendment is important.

There must be control, not ban. But unless democracy is not “safe” to do a dissarmation of the guns in possession of people that got them under the previous law, the law will be worth nothing. To run a law like that you need not just the vote but the safety and colab of the people.

So if the guns --theoretically-- are to fight fascists & protect the states from illegal occupation by federal troops under a criminal POTUS who would weaponize American troops against American citizens in violation of posse comitatus, & that's happening RIGHT NOW in NY & LA w/more planned...🤷‍♂️

In LA and NY we never used guns. We could have but we know better. Even so, people marched over the capitol for a coup and there they are… killing people and free. Like I said, it is not about gun ban, but gun control for mental health issues, and definitely not war guns.For that you need democracy

You will need to remove all the war guns and also the guns from mentally ill and dangerous criminals. But now you cant bc that law will be used to target people for crimes like being brown or black. You need a base, that we had with Obama, for example, but was undermined by the GOP

Oh god another person spouting the "war guns" crap. The big bad AR-15 is a mere semi auto. Same as a handgun. Speaking of handguns the literal purpose of them is to kill people. And a shotgun would be far more effective against crowds.

If a gun is made to kill dozens instead of one, is not for self defense is for war. It is pure and mere education

My brother in Christ. Just about every muzzleloader in existence can penetrate multiple people. There is no gun designed to kill only one person. Also I do appreciate the sheer irony of a person saying "it is pure and mere education".

If you don’t see the difference, i can’t sow the the evidence

The difference is that one looks scawier than the other. The truth is that the presence of guns doesn't change the desire. Only the method. Take away guns and they'll just switch to bombs. And you can't take away the bombs because common household items can become them.

If you give a machine gun to a crazy person that one might kill 50 people, if you give that person a glock It might get 10. It is not about scary or not. Same way you should not allow to sell bazookas to people because those are war guns and not self defense. Nor grenades, nor tanks, nor nukes