Different levels of law enforcement are seeming to have different levels of government responsibility/priorities. Can you offer specifics to clarify the rhetoric?
Different levels of law enforcement are seeming to have different levels of government responsibility/priorities. Can you offer specifics to clarify the rhetoric?
Good question. I wasn’t commenting on law enforcement per se, but on judicial procedure, specifically, how Georgia law mandates a pause when an appeal is filed. So the judge’s action isn’t discretionary or ideological; it’s legally automatic. 1/4
That said, I do think it’s worth examining how different branches of government interpret their responsibilities. The commission’s refusal to seat nominees, despite a court order, raises questions about institutional defiance and selective accountability. 2/4
Defiance here isn’t about optics, it’s about survival. When compliance risks institutional harm, resistance becomes necessary. We’ve seen this before: the Supreme Court allowed board member terminations to proceed without first ruling on their legality. 3/4
That kind of procedural delay can have irreversible consequences. 4/4