Does it concern you that he wrote an entire article about a painting and talked to not one art historian or art critic? Honestly it does bother me
Does it concern you that he wrote an entire article about a painting and talked to not one art historian or art critic? Honestly it does bother me
Yes—true that. I guess I was just glad that scholarly opinions were solicited at this point. But you are quite right. I have other complaints but am trying to stay positive in this one!
I think you know by now that I'm like a dog with a bone on things like this, so I hope you'll forgive my subsequent post🙏. Since art historians have been writing about these types of images for so long now, I think it would have been preferable to have that perspective included
No argument from me, and nothing to apologize for!!