avatar
Alex Bozikovic @alexbozikovic.bsky.social

The state of the Canadian housing discourse. I’ve now been blocked on three social media platforms by Andy Yan, professor @sfuurb.bsky.social, who speaks to “friendly” media all the time.

image image
sep 1, 2025, 12:51 pm • 30 1

Replies

avatar
Mark Allerton @mark-allerton.bsky.social

He blocked me on the old place because I argued he was misusing the term “peer reviewed” in reference to his famous non-Anglicized names study.

sep 1, 2025, 3:08 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Sean Marshall @seanyyz.bsky.social

I can’t believe *that* was his methodology as if Vancouver has no second, third, fourth, fifth generation Chinese-Canadian citizens.

sep 1, 2025, 4:58 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mark Allerton @mark-allerton.bsky.social

If it had actually been academically peer reviewed the reviewers may have had some questions. But he just had some of his “peers” read it.

sep 1, 2025, 5:43 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kimberley Noble @kimberleynoble.bsky.social

Given the quality of your work, I'd see this as further evidence that you are doing your job.

sep 1, 2025, 12:53 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Jens von Bergmann @jensvb.bsky.social

Yesh, it’s weird that people aren’t willing to tolerate even the possibility of engaging into discussions on housing. But this does help explain the fragmented nature of the housing discourse.

sep 1, 2025, 4:09 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
GRIDS Vancouver @grids.reillywood.com

He’s also got Frances Bula blocked. You’re not missing much, Yan is an intellectually dishonest NIMBY whose job is promoting his night school. (btw his night school is so bad I got a refund the one time I attended a class)

sep 1, 2025, 1:23 pm • 6 0 • view
avatar
GRIDS Vancouver @grids.reillywood.com

After a decade+ in Vancouver housing politics there are very few people I respect less than Andy Yan. He will comment on anything to get in the news, and never has anything constructive or positive to say; it's always "actually this is problematic because X." Even opposes social housing proposals

sep 1, 2025, 1:45 pm • 7 0 • view
avatar
GRIDS Vancouver @grids.reillywood.com

He is one of the most intellectually dishonest people I have encountered in this space. When BC was introducing provincial housing legislation he complained back-to-back about how 1) this might cause redevelopment in low-income neighbourhoods 2) BC's richest cities were required to build more

image image
sep 1, 2025, 1:55 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
The Majestic Goose @majestic-goose.bsky.social

To push back a little bit on 1), there is a risk of displacing people who currently have affordable rental housing by replacing those affordable rental units with newer less affordable ones. It’s a valid concern that new housing doesn’t displace vulnerable tenants.

sep 1, 2025, 2:30 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
GRIDS Vancouver @grids.reillywood.com

If you have that concern you should not be mad that *West Van and Oak Bay* are specifically being targeted for more housing!

sep 1, 2025, 2:34 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
The Majestic Goose @majestic-goose.bsky.social

Haha ya that’s fair

sep 1, 2025, 2:37 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Brian F. Kelcey @stateofthecity.bsky.social

Sure, but that's a problem to manage, not an excuse to choke off all new supply and turn Metro Vancouver into a luxurious prison for the status quo.

sep 1, 2025, 2:46 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Alex Bozikovic @alexbozikovic.bsky.social

O

sep 1, 2025, 3:04 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
The Majestic Goose @majestic-goose.bsky.social

I don’t disagree, we need more supply, I just called it a valid concern. If you look at rezoning applications in Van, most new towers are set to replace existing 3-4 storey apartments, which are currently some of the most affordable rental units in the city. They’re not building towers in point grey

sep 1, 2025, 3:30 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Brian F. Kelcey @stateofthecity.bsky.social

Probably for the best

sep 1, 2025, 12:54 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Nevin Thompson @nevint.bsky.social

As I recall, he worked with David Eby to quantify "foreign real estate investment" in Vancouver by going through the equivalent of the phone book and counting property owners with "Asian names."

sep 1, 2025, 4:43 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Brian F. Kelcey @stateofthecity.bsky.social

Yup.

sep 1, 2025, 4:43 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Brian F. Kelcey @stateofthecity.bsky.social

You've made me wonder what happened to that other guy who tried to ride the blame-the-Chinese-names wave to fame. The young 'progressive' who insisted speculation was *the* problem... unless it was done by (implicitly white) Canadians. What was his name again?

sep 1, 2025, 4:46 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Nevin Thompson @nevint.bsky.social

I'm not sure! Although that is a common theme, "RE investment for me, but not for thee." The inherent contradictions in the discourse makes me wonder if "public consultations" are actually pragmatic exercises, unless, pragmatically speaking, the goal is to never build housing.

sep 1, 2025, 5:49 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
antigentri.bsky.social @antigentri.bsky.social

What kind of "professor" blocks anyone who may scrutinize him and his ideas. Oh, wait... he's from SFU, where the school's motto is "Agree with me or SFU". Makes sense now. 🤣

sep 1, 2025, 2:16 pm • 0 0 • view