avatar
Grab Them By The Revenue @gtbtr.bsky.social

Repealing Citizens United does not effect anyone's ability to fundraise from people. It would reverse classifying corporate entities as people. Alternatively, if corporations insist they are people, we should enact a corporate death penalty.

aug 14, 2025, 4:39 pm • 1 0

Replies

avatar
Will Ormay @willormay.bsky.social

The case stemmed from a documentary called "Hillary: The Movie" released by the conservative non-profit organization. They were restricted in how they funded the advertisement of the film because of FEC regulations on “electioneering communications.” The same thing could happen with a climate doc.

aug 14, 2025, 4:43 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Grab Them By The Revenue @gtbtr.bsky.social

No. It doesn't matter what the case stems from, what matters is the effect of the ruling. The ruling determined that corporations are people and that means they have free-speech and the right to make campaign contributions. Reversing this has no impact on people, only on corporations.

aug 14, 2025, 4:46 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Will Ormay @willormay.bsky.social

I’m very proud of you for having your slogans memorized, but do you not understand how these restrictions would also apply to a documentary about climate change, J6, or the harms of vaccine conspiracy theories?

aug 14, 2025, 4:48 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Grab Them By The Revenue @gtbtr.bsky.social

It is easier to create new legislation than repeal old legislation, so I'd rather see a corporate death penalty enacted. We could force liquidation of any company found guilty of causing injury or death for profit, and ban the executives from ever operating any kind of business ever again.

aug 14, 2025, 4:53 pm • 1 1 • view
avatar
Will Ormay @willormay.bsky.social

That was not responsive to my question in the slightest. I don’t think you understand Citizens United or what you’re asking for.

aug 14, 2025, 6:41 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Grab Them By The Revenue @gtbtr.bsky.social

It wasn't responsive because you're making a bad faith argument in support of capitalism rather than a good faith argument in support of free speech.

aug 14, 2025, 8:02 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Will Ormay @willormay.bsky.social

I’m completely open to campaign finance reform and looking at super PACs etc. but you guys have to articulate a policy that doesn’t ban a bunch of things I would consider political speech. I haven’t heard any proposals that do that, and most people don’t seem to understand CU.

aug 14, 2025, 8:10 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Joe @anthr0.bsky.social

lol I like it

aug 14, 2025, 5:03 pm • 1 0 • view