@VeroniqueB99 I don't like Trump either, but neither his wife nor his son became a US citizen through jus soli, so this just makes us look like we don't know what we're talking about.
@VeroniqueB99 I don't like Trump either, but neither his wife nor his son became a US citizen through jus soli, so this just makes us look like we don't know what we're talking about.
@stevefoerster @VeroniqueB99 Americans are ius soli citizens from birth, ius sanguineous is dependent upon the completion of paperwork thatβs never bothered with for domestic births. The idea that one is older or superior to the other is a neoconfederate talking point. birthright citizenship for [β¦]
@theothersimo @VeroniqueB99 Come on, at this point I think you're missing my point on purpose. Neither Trump's wife nor son would be deportable in the absence of the the particular process of asserting US citizenship that he and his supporters oppose. Does that way of putting it make you less [β¦]
@stevefoerster @VeroniqueB99 π
@theothersimo @VeroniqueB99 It sounds like you're arguing against a bunch of stuff I didn't say. Either way, it had nothing to do with my point.
@stevefoerster @VeroniqueB99 the language you use presupposes that ius soli is an exception made for people who donβt qualify for ius sanguineous. This was never true, even before the 14th amendment, and if anything itβs the other way around (if only for the convenience of keepers of vital records).
@stevefoerster sorry but his son(s) and daughter did....