They didn’t scrape TPM??

Dang now I want to poke around.

Most of us didn't hold copyright ion published articles from early in our careers. Journals would seem to have a beef but I'm not suiting up to defend them. I actually hope my research has been read by AI.

Yep, my last book in its entirety I guess and a bunch of my articles and book reviews.

People deserve to be paid for their work 👏

Although, given the extractive nature of the academic publishing business, I imagine your grievance is more related to having your work be appropriated by a slop-generating social menace than the copyright violation.

Found a paper from my thesis project in there too!

Several of my papers are there, as are a couple of my wife's. So, fine, they're from the early 90's, early relative to the database, but not stunning. But then I found a collection of my *father's* papers from the 70's. Should I be aggrieved or flattered?

My book is there, along with a few journal articles. Weirdly painful to see it.

Maybe a new book on captivity narratives and white-shoe law firms?

Get ‘em!!

LOL. Meanwhile I’ve seen several threads on Mastodon shared by aggrieved academics (including myself) involving numerous books and many, many journal articles.

Mazel tov?

About 25% of Libgen stuff is out of copyright, so no foul there. With the rest, AI will pay the plaintiffs off, even though they are mining the material for word frequencies, not content. It’s doubtful that copyright protects that. That use wasn’t foreseen when CR protection was developed.