No 'Allen spokesman' has come forward 'confirming' that. That's why that alleged 'spokesman' was left anonymous. Christina Engelhardt has come forward saying she was NOT 16 (= underage) after all. The @THR editor who published her interview, claims 'Babi' said 16. These LIARS are all so credible!
Allen’s spokeswoman is Leslee Dart. www.bustle.com/entertainmen.... His relationship with Engelhardt wasn’t criminal, but it was creepy, and Epstein knew about it. www.thedailybeast.com/inside-woody.... The NYT published Allen’s 2016 letter about dinners with Epstein. www.nytimes.com/2025/08/05/u...
For some reason, the @NYTimes 'forgot' to publish Woody's second letter. We know it is authentic as, just like the first letter, it is written on a typewriter, it has Woody's signature, and it contains only one paragraph.
In other words, if you believe that 'NYT letter to Epstein' is authentic, I have all of Amsterdam's bridges to sell to you.
And, just like with the @WJS article, the 'journalists' will not reveal their sources and disclose their 'documents' for inspection and authentication. Are you gullible?
Woody Allen and his spokeswoman had opportunities to deny the story or the letter’s authenticity, but declined to do so. It is not clear whether the 17-year-old Tracy in Allen’s Manhattan is based on Christina Englehardt, but, coincidentally, she goes to Dalton School, where Epstein used to teach.
Woody Allen is not so stupid as to waste his time by giving this idiotic 'letter' free publicity. Any 'authenticity' is to be established by the NY Times or objective expertise; instead the NY Times *refuses* to disclose the source/document. It's VERY clear that 17 yo 'Tracy' is based on 'Stacey'.
Woody Allen’s obsession with young girls is a bit more persistent than he likes to admit, as is evident in the "Woody Papers" at Princeton. "Allen's work is flatly boorish. Running through all of the boxes is an insistent, vivid obsession with young women and girls." Epstein was well aware of that.
Allen spent a lifetime writing & directing 50 movies in the course of 60 years. They include lots of romances with all kinds of women, young and (mostly) older. There are ZERO 'young girls' in those 50 movies. There's ONE above-age teenager in 50 movies. Maybe YOU are 'obsessed with young girls'?
The picture from Mic illustrates the article’s point, "It’s clear that this theme of older men getting involved with younger women is a preoccupation for the 81-year-old director."
Only *one*, above-age teenager in 50 movies, that include literally *hundreds* of female actresses & love-interests. Their average age is 33,5. 80% is between 25 and 55. And you blindly believe 'Woody Allen is preoccupied with getting involved with "younger women"'? It is an absurd claim, sorry.
Indeed, "running through all of the boxes is an insistent, vivid obsession with young women & girls"; and that is apparently what Richard Morgan did. The NYT readership did not like the product of Morgan's obsession with young women and girls. In fact, they called it 'dishonest' and explained why.
Leslee Dart has never made such statement, was not named as the 'spokesperson' in the WSJ article. No one else has come forward to claim having made the statement. The 'relationship with Engelhardt' was confirmed by no one, not even by Mia Farrow, who figured in it, and is never too lazy to smear.