I wrote 'verifiable evidence'. That alleged 'letter' is no 'verifiable evidence'. The NY Times refuses to disclose its source, and no researcher has been allowed to authenticate that 'letter' which its weird contents, its many spelling errors, and lack of paragraphing.
As for your concern about the letter, why are spelling errors & lack of paragraphs odd, given WA - as a fan, you should know this - uses a typewriter he bought when he was 16 Seems you're not much of fan, just interested in denying he was friends with a convicted pedo-rapist, which even he admits
The only photo with Epstein and Allen in the same frame has them walking 20 feet apart without any visible contact. It was taken by a professional, paparazzo Elder Ordonez, who claims copyright. As Epstein is constantly looking Ordonez in the eye, it is likely that Epstein hired him.
Or Epstein spotted him, hence the lack of a smile But you keep stanning for the friend of convicted pedo-rapist
You keep claiming some imagined 'friendship' for which no material, verifiable evidence exists; while the available evidence points to the absence of any such 'friendship'. You *do* know that everyone and their sister is trying to smear disliked people by associating them with Epstein, don't you?
Of course, it could be a matter of pure chance that a well-known paparazzo-for-hire happens to have set up a 'burst shot' for no particular reason along the route of Woody's and Soon-Yi's daily stroll to their restaurant, while a famous, avid photo collector just happened to have casually walked by.
If this only known photo with Epstein and Allen in the same frame, this 'burst shot' taken by a hired paparazzo *proves anything*, it is that Epstein could not get a photo of him and Allen in any other way. So far for their 'friendship' and 'frequent contacts'.
How about this story from 2023? Despite Epstein being a convicted pedo-rapist, WA - accused of CSA by two of his kids - didn't see that as a barrier to friendship and repeated contact But you keep stanning for him, Else - it's a strong look! www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epst...
And in case you don't read the story, a spokesman for WA didn't deny it Your guy liked hanging out with a convicted pedo-rapist Own it
Oh, and here's WA himself talking about his friendship with a convicted pedo-rapist, and stating that the photo - which you dismiss - was taken after leaving the pedo-rapist's house Sure seems like WA doesn't think raping children is much of a character flaw www.showbiz411.com/2024/04/17/e...
Take a deep dive in the credibility of 'journalist' Roger Friedman. Fired at Fox. Sacked at The Hollywood Reporter. Now a gossip blogger. Need I say more? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_F...
What's your claim, that he fabricated that interview with WA, and this is fake? Seems unlikely in the context of an official interview, with a photo, and no denial from WA's camp in the days after My take is that few credible journalists want to interview the friend of a convicted pedo-rapist
Please name that 'spokesman'. You can't. Because @DaveCBenoit and @KhadeejaSafdar 'forgot' to name the 'spokesman'. And won't respond to questions. Try for yourself if you like. No 'Woody spokesman' has come to the fore to confirm the WJS's unverifiable claim. Don't tell me you're gullible.
After two long years, the Wall Street Journal has not disclosed a single 'document' or 'calendar' they claim to have in their possession. NO ONE, including you, can read, inspect, authenticate said 'materials'. 'Journalists' @DaveCBenoit and @Khadeejasafdar never respond to requests. 'Nuff said.
Why do they need to disclose anything, when WA himself has admitted he was friends with the convicted pedo-rapist? 1/2 www.showbiz411.com/2024/04/17/e...
And another quote from WA Your guy clearly enjoyed hanging out with a convicted pedo-rapist Seems odd, to me 2/2 www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epst...
Remaining factual and honoring verifiable facts is indeed a 'strong look'. As opposed to being uncritical, gullible, and susceptible to audience manipulation. I'm sure we agree on that.
Sure, except WA is quoted on the record has having attended multiple events at Epstein's home And you, whose hobby is defending WA, don't even know that! Wonder what else you're missing?