The NY Times seems to be laying the groundwork here for an argument that “yes, this may not be ‘explicitly’ enumerated as a presidential power in the Constitution, but it’s obviously part of the powers of the president.” 1/2
The NY Times seems to be laying the groundwork here for an argument that “yes, this may not be ‘explicitly’ enumerated as a presidential power in the Constitution, but it’s obviously part of the powers of the president.” 1/2
Just the kind of circular, results-driven, nonsensical argument that the current 6-3 SCOTUS will eat up with a spoon. 2/2