No, just fewer people wanted him to be the nominee.
No, just fewer people wanted him to be the nominee.
Funny, evidence suggests internal collusion to capsize his campaign www.nytimes.com/2016/07/23/u...
Your ignorance is both spectacular and adorable in its fullness.
> posts proof "YOURE IGNORANT" fucking ace in the hole for your type isn't it?
Block, don't engage. Let the #resistance dipshits form their own deluded little bubble isolated from the rest of us.
Except you didn't post proof. It's hilarious that you think you did.
"the sign can't hurt me if I can't read it!"
There's the problem, you think signs are evidence. You Sanders dead-enders are tragically comic.
Fascinating how 2000 emails are now a form of sign. Bizarre, really.
Fascinating how a socialist non Democrat with strong grassroots support felt he deserved ANY support from the Democratic establishment to win.
"we can't want better because good things aren't democrat! We must push them out" and this is how you get the moderate to far right creep in action.
Democrats when in the majority do positive things that benefit us and prevent Republicans from harming us. That second part is not important to privileged socialists and now Republicans are harming all the people socialists claimed to care about.
Was it 2k? Hilarious.
...yes, they're publicly available you fucking numbnuts.
2000? Hilarious.
Elaborate?
Where's the "proof" in that article?
Maybe the dozens and dozens of emails?
Thought it was 2k? What do you think those emails are "proof" of...I hope you've never and will never serve on a jury.