The DNC argued in court that they had the legal right to undermine the popular vote.

Yep they argued it but they never said they did it...also there is zero fucking evidence they did. Sanders had his teeth kicked in. Cope harder about it.

Yes, the DNC and Hillary Clinton kicked his teeth in.

Sanders re:voters...they just weren't that into him, much like you and anyone you've ever been romantically interested in.

Keep going. You're really helping her image.

That you think I care about her image or anything I write somehow has an effect on her image shows just how divorced from reality you are.

I don't think you care.

Then why bring it up? Have you missed your lithium dose today?

Because you're doing such a great job.

At turning you out? Yep. But your obvious mental instability robs it of it's joy.

“In evaluating Plaintiffs’ claims at this stage, the Court assumes their allegations are true—that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Clinton and sought to propel her ahead of her Democratic opponent,” the court order dismissing the lawsuit stated.

..."assumes"...you suck at this.

Again, the truth remains the truth. You're resorting to petty personal attacks. Good for you? It doesn't make you more convincing. It doesn't make the DNC's actions ethical. It doesn't alleviate Clinton of her complicity in undermining the people.

Exactly, you just don't have a grasp of reality let alone any truth you claim to know. Then you cried about apt descriptions.