Support your claims with evidence and we'll be right behind you. Otherwise, shut your mouth.
Support your claims with evidence and we'll be right behind you. Otherwise, shut your mouth.
Cass Report. Read it.
Ok, so the Cass report creates recommendations for care in the UK. Does it also provide evidence that US medical experts are charlatans pushing an agenda for big pharma as is claimed? Big, if true.
No, it does not impute motive. That's the couch-lover's conspiracy brain kicking into overdrive. HOWEVER, from a purely consequentialist standpoint, pre-Cass Report GUM in the United Kingdom was known for its progressive excesses (again, without imputing motive).
Ok, but that sounds like something the medical professional community should be sorting out based on most reliable evidence. The notion that expertise or science are subject to approval by politicians is my issue with these kinds of statements.
The problem was that until the Cass Report came out, the default position (not supported by any MEDICAL evidence, but instead by soft-science Gender Theory "researchers") was "you MUST allow trans patients to self-identify", "you MUST allow pubescent trans patients to take puberty blockers" etc.
The ENTIRETY of trans care is based on MEDICAL evidence. There are literally THOUSANDS of papers of MEDICAL evidence on the matter, all supporting Trans affirming care. I can give them to you, but you wouldn't read them. The default position was ALWAYS to evaluate a person after they self I.D
That's outright false. Trans patients before the cass report had to have a pcp or family doctor refer them to a clinic with a years long waiting list, something they could, and more often than not, did, refuse to do. On top of this. Gender "theory" is not "soft science" it's replicable & supported
Did, it's been debunked, every page is a lie
Bollocks. "... led by Hilary Cass, a retired consultant paediatrician and the former president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health" - as in, an ACTUAL doctor, not Clarence fucking Thomas.
Yes, but you also have to consider that there are concerts about the report's methodology and it wasn't peer reviewed, so it smells of ideological fuckery. None of you read the damn thing or the expert responses to it.
It. Has. Been. Fucking. Debunked. Every word of it is lies. Clarence mama's shouldn't be speaking on this either, but Hillary Cass is a fucking fraud. It's "studies" aren't replicable, the summations it makes from available data are straight up wrong, and it basically recommends genocide for fun