Another conservative white guy destined to never have a real job www.linkedin.com/in/paul-ingr...
Another conservative white guy destined to never have a real job www.linkedin.com/in/paul-ingr...
My brain initially read "Minecraft" instead of "Microsoft" and thought, "yeah that tracks."
Paul Ingrassia (never heard of him before) is one sick fascist asshole.
Kind of... Agree with him... Cough cough, citizen's united
I stopped reading at "parasitical" 🙄
@GOP Do you recognize America anymore? Is this the type of AMERICA you were hoping for? We will be remembering all the traitors to democracy. Act now to save your soul and restore our once thriving nation. Preserve our future today.
This guy got his JD in 2022 and spent 2 years as a law clerk at 2 law firms. Then, a year as comms director for a conservative legal group before joining the Trump administration. But sure, he's an expert on Constitutional law and knows better than the judiciary.
Any time a magat talks morality or law and order, snort laugh at them and then walk away.
Judges following the constitution & not letting MAGA get away w/ unconstitutional act they wanna do to POC & women = judicial ideologues 🤔 Self-awareness is devoid in MAGA & the current Republican party Pretty funny, & very sad
(do not intend to limit just to POC & women, as due process is a right to all & allowing them to deprive immigrants of due process means they can deprive anyone)
If Trump decides to fight SCOTUS it will be the end of him. One way or another.
God I hope so
This is the dumbest thing I've read since Trump took office in January. That's almost impressive.
“It sounds like he’s spent too much time sniffin’ his own farts.” - my grandpa
They're definitely going to ignore the SC order. So, what's Roberts going to do about it?
Here’s his view of immigration, btw 👇 bsky.app/profile/khud...
These Trumpers sure are an easily frightened bunch of pathetic cowards.
I feel like I would have noticed the perpetual menacing he describes here
I guess he never learned that the Roman Empire was multi-ethnic, & that Rome itself was founded by violent barbarian hordes who overwhelmed the peaceful Estruscan civilization. Civilization is always in a state of flux. It's when subjective beliefs replace objective reality that civilizations fall.
That’s quite a narrative.
JFC. Looked this guy up and first entry was a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist and I thought, “What the hell??” But that Paul Ingrassia died, so this one is just an asshole lunatic with the same name.
Who is this Paul Ingrassia? He's spouting the usual MAGA tripe, deliberately misinterpreting the situation.
“Gravitas of executive power”? What is this dude on?
What is Ingrassia even talking about? What are these virtues that apparently override the law? This is crazy.
I love this! The WH liaison is saying the judges on the Supreme Court has no understanding of the law, not like Trump does. I bet even Saturday Night Live can't do justice [sic] to this one!
Yet this is the bio of the guy telling the Supreme Court what the law is
@cornelluniversity.bsky.social It seems like you did a really poor job educating this one about the law. Maybe time to pull his degree?
Some of these “elite universities” need to start revoking some degrees.
If he scrubbed his bio, I'm glad I screenshotted it when I did.
Dunnng Kruger self-own.
Dude can't hold a job. There's always a good reason for that.
Yea he probably couldn't get along with his so called "WOKE" and "DEI" coworkers, and management figured out he was the problem. Just my opinion.
Persecution 😭
Isn't that all of MAGA?
Thats quite a few job changes in a short time...
See also this part of his resume bsky.app/profile/stev...
GatewayPundit? Embarrassing to include that in the resume. 🤣
wow, he left off the previous summer's scooping at Cold Stone Creamery
"It is emphatically the province and duty of the Gateway Pundit to say what the law is." - Samuel Alito
Probably
He graduated three years ago. LOL. LMAO.
Is this Herr Miller's understudy? Sounds like it!
Probably
not sending their best
Four jobs in fourteen months, a seasomed hand at the helm at DHS.
seasoned
He’s been failing upward. I sense a trend.
Dang. This guy can’t hold a job.
I was thinking the same thing
first thing that popped into my head
MFer said “judges in law courts” and he’s trying to give advice.
judges in law courts 🤦🏻♀️
As compared to what? Judges in basketball courts? Tennis courts? Lol... Doesn't even know the terms of art and he's trying to school SCOTUS ... Oh the confidence of a privileged male.
Hey, he wanted to absolutely eliminate any confusion and distinguish them from judges in the Miss Universe contest who were employees of Trump.
🤣🤣
Good point, good point.😂
He also thinks Trump is going to restore the rule of law by denying that even exists.
The problem is the MAGA Cult wants a White Male Christian ethnostate. They literally want the United States to be the Christian version of Iran.
I mean that is what passes for qualified and experienced with this administration…🤷 Not sure a lot of these youngsters have read much history though. They dismiss it as an irrelevant humanities subject and fail to grasp its lessons. They will though, further down the line.
🍿🍿🍿
#NiceLegacyYaGotThereRoberts
To be fair, Roberts not understanding his role is how we got here in the first place
So who's the 'tard?
This is actually, in a quite literal way, nonsense.
Who is this guy? What's his approach to law?
The ink on his law g degree isn’t even dry. I wonder if he’s even admitted!
He works for the administration, and his approach to law appears to be “ We can do whatever we want.”
Technically Roberts kind of told them they could do whatever they want.
No wonder he got hired by the Trump admistration.
Exactly…bush league intellect infects the entire extended admin…asserting that their interpretation of the law is the only correct one…broadcasting their disdain for those who actually interpret it correctly (or at least try) in order to brainwash the cult to fully justify their King Dumfu*k.
www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/du...
His approach seems to be: "There are bigger issues here than whether or not the federal government violated the Constitution." Too bad for him that there is no bigger issue than that.
Approach of entire administration: It's Good to be the King!
Yes, word salad.
Wow. Will they allow themselves to be subjugated and humiliated?
Mr. Paul Bowtie more succinctly: Up: ↓ Down: ↑
Ah yes. The very Trumpian “everyone else is crazy/stupid, and I alone have all the answers” attitude. People like this need to be studied through a very small window into their padded rooms.
is this good
They almost get it, but confused the majority with the minority
Don't think they'll respond
Did ChatGPT write this word salad, with “talk radio pundit, but make it sound sophisticated” as its inputs?
What a sick puppy!
He seems like another Shapiro. A stupid persons idea of a smart person. He literally makes no argument and says nothing. Losers. #DumbFascism
Well aren’t Justice Roberts and the SC fortunate to have Ingrassia around to give them a remedial lecture on Constitutional Law !
How did an entire generation of people forget what America was founded on? The concept of immigration is core to who we are and we came to be. I wish we could deport these white nationalist/supremacist jackwads. We’d all be better for it.
Because they were mostly white people immigrating back then.
What utter trash and nonsense
Actually, nobody likes him. He's a slow learner.
That justice has been bought & paid for.
Taken to its “common sense” conclusion, Mr. Ingrassia would believe murdering undocumented immigrants is justifiable to protect the sovereign borders of the United States.
Is it me, or is this guy pretty much saying we need a dictator to fix the laws? Am I reading this correctly? And is THAT what people who voted for Trump have wanted all along?
But also, Trump breaks the laws on the books and most of the time gets away with it. Is that what this guy wants too. The law for thee but not for me?
I read the first paragraph without knowing anything about this Paul character and I thought to myself "oh, he must be referring to unitary executive theory". My bad.
I hate when judges in are highest court don’t know the law. Thank goodness for scholars in the administration are here to help.
“Judges in law courts” as opposed to, say, judges on volleyball courts
And who is this gnat when he's at home?
NeoNazi say what?
God, no words. because if the educational system is a stalwart, this idiots assessment has no bases in fact.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFd2...
It goes without saying that these cretins lurrrrved the judiciary when it was taking bodily autonomy away from women, blocking student loan forgiveness, etc
He's a 20 something gateway pundit dude.
I’m sure it’s a ied hire that totally knows more about law than big John. Probably someone Trump met at the omelet station at one of his crap country clubs.
Maybe he needs to appear in front of Scotus and give them a refresher…I’m sure they will appreciate the wealth of experience he has to offer.
In fairness, John Roberts thought he’d get a ticker tape parade and a statue on the National Mall for writing the trump immunity decision
Has he earned badges in bootlicking AND goose stepping in a brown shirt? People he works with are possibly hoping for him to get a bad batch of sushi. abcnews.go.com/US/after-cla...
Paul Ingrassia has lost his goddamned mind.
He's a 30 year old insurrectionist ... he never had a mind to lose.
For once I agree with the White House, albeit in a different context.
Weird how someone in his position is so opposed the Constitution and the rule of law
Roberts helped suckle that trash. Let him euthanize his pet monster.
Given some of his choices, they may be correct.
Call the Capitol switchboard (202) 224-3121) every day and ask: Why isn’t my Senator/Representative calling to impeach? You swore to defend the Constitution. We got a dictator problem. The concentration camps are here. Shout “Impeach!” All together. Every day. (Please repost.)
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you to see that a Trump toadie is a fascist imbecile.
Will Roberts grow a set?
I hopehe turns on them.
Hey, John Roberts. How ya liking your "unitary executive" now? SCOTUS or no, there are in fact multiple ways of being literally too dumb to live.
Ya see? This is what happens to eveybody who opposes the regime. "You are our people. Either you work for and support us or we publically tear your heart out." Fine group of criminals, thugs, and nazis we voted in
"The proper function and role of law is to support whatever Donald Trump is doing at this second. And if Donald Trump changes his mind in the next second, the law should also support that also."
SCOTUS is upholding Due Process, which this guy is writing to oppose. Due Process expressly applies to "persons" in the US, so for this "common sense" argument to work, you have to premise that immigrants are not people. They clearly believe that, but they must grasp that it's not "common sense."
Cheeto only has the best and brightest 👊🇺🇸💥
Machine-generated alt text says what?
Kakapo ansnal zndnannwu ahhs hjaleibf that poisons our nation.
Many people are saying
They could not be more in contempt or contemptible
Man that tree of liberty is gettin’ real fucking thirsty boss
Roberts has to get out of the cuck chair he built by giving traitor trump immunity first.
First they came for the immigrants, now they are after the Supreme Court justices. I have to say... That escalated quickly.
Well, Paul has been out of law school for a whole 3 years, so he should know.
I think Paul was rummaging around in some dusty boxes at Grifter-A-Lotto, found some leftover diplomas from the Trump University of Law, and awarded himself a J.D.
That makes sense. Otherwise I'd be really embarrassed for Cornell Law School.
The regime already made it clear that Trump and his cronies will decide what the law is. Maybe SCOTUS should have said something then.
Same vibes as folks who proclaim - the Pope is not a true catholic.
My favorite part is, ”…Its practitioners must have mastery over these virtues in order to properly execute the laws for a free and self governing people.” So it’s all about the ‘right’ kind of people, knowing how and when to apply the law?? This is some extraordinarily incoherent bullshit!
Paul Ingrassia hates America, is a propagandist for the ruination of America, and is trying to push the delusional nonsense that a convicted felon who ignores statutes, the constitution, and judicial rulings cares at all about the rule of law.
This wet-eared wee twat, who might as well be his little brother, thinks they're "a force not to be reckoned with". Clueless green treasonweasels, all of them. bsky.app/profile/muel...
🤦♀️
He needs to go back to high school and learn about checks and balances.
Law must be subject to virtue, and virtue is embodied in the leader. This is what Nazi legal theory referred to as "working towards the Führer."
Having read Alito's dissent one has to question whether the liaison had spoken to and received the legal advice from Alito.
Wow. This guy is a fanatic even by the standards of the Trump regime.
This entire law philosophy is "let people in power decide which laws apply to them and which don't, based on their own code of ethics" which is the most fucked up principle imaginable.
that dipshit is wearing a bow tie
So judges who grift/succumb to political power should step down? “Law must be moderated by the virtues, including individual responsibility and wisdom. Its practitioners must have mastery over these virtues in order to properly execute the laws for a free and self governing country”
Holy crap.
Quote tweeting johnny maga
Who is this asshole?
John, push back really fucking hard.
Where do they get off? (Although, now that I think about it, I may have a question or two as well.)
And here I thought Trump was taking legal advice from Stephen Miller. Paul Ingrassia is apparently an attorney, though I think he might be way out of his comfort zone.
There is no indication of accreditation on his linkedin page. I see references to law school graduation, but lots of people do that. Too many in fact.
Cheeto and personal responsibility is an oxymoron. Cheetos executive orders are blessed things; Biden's were unconstitutional. If we use Cheeto's morality as a measure of right and wrong, it's over. His upside-down narrative of corruption and theft is an abomination. They will defend anything.
So future dem president can ignore scotus, cool.
Can someone explain
Everything in this man's post is nonsense, much of it completely opposite of the truth.
Someone who doesn't understand Marbury v. Madison is big mad that his godking president was told he can't do something by the very people who determine what is and isn't Constitutional. Because he is godking president, this man argues, they don't have the right to do that.
I’m glad someone reads these for us. I can only read orders and declarations, I can’t stomach the not-even-specious spittle they dribble from their evil mouths
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24...
Calling balls and strikes. Isn't that Roberts's jurisprudence?
"judges in law courts" not to be confused with "judges in ice skating tournaments"
Ugh. Creepy as all hell.
Yep.The whole party is full of the most self righteous, arrogant and disgusting ppl
The "allocate rights" part was alarming.
Interesting. So the new strategy from the admin is to poison the term “rule of law”? The fact that the #WhiteHouse saw need to use the word “reestablish” should be all you need to see. The #RuleOfLaw has not left — it is an ever evolving concept that should grow with society. #LivingConstitution
don't underrate it; if it's one thing they're very good at it's Goebbelseque propaganda techniques and this is one of them. "MiniTruth" "MiniLove"
Listen, Paul. Few are saying that countries should have no borders. What IS being said is that when being taken over those borders, individuals are entitled to DUE PROCESS. Also, if your guy is selling citizenship as if it's a membership to one of his golf courses, "citizenship" has little meaning.
Yes, Roberts has no understanding of law like when he ruled last year that Presidents were above the law.
Laughable Bullshit. Conservative Brainiacs’ word salad.
You could respond to that in a hundred ways. The simplest being, "wtf are you even going on about?" Words have meaning. The executive branch isn't reestablishing the rule of law through a smash and grab crime spree, I can assure you.
The leopard licks its chops.
Can't say I disagree, although Roberts didn't show it in this particular case
“Mastery over these virtues…” — does this guy think that judges are wizards?
well they do wear robes
Incredible that they stacked the court and they're still bitching.
This was obvious back when Bush** nominated him. I felt he didn't have the experience or the smarts to be a SC justice, much less Chief Justice. He's a Federalist and probably another attempt by Bush** to avenge his daddy, whose 1992 nomination of Roberts to the DC Court of Appeals went nowhere.
Trump take court
Ingrassia linksTate bros: rep’d in defamation lawsuit filed against several of their victims; acted as Tate publicist and got him onto T Carlson show; praised Tate in online posts called him”an extraordinary human being" giving “a dying West some hope for renewal" www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
What is that word salad actually positing? That due process is dependent on national sovereignty? That courts require strictly enforceable PHYSICAL borders to function? That the law is corporeal? Our nation exists as a body of laws, via due process, by the CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED. What a noodle
Well, it’s not as if the Taney Court, er, I mean, Roberts Court, didn’t invite this level of extra-constitutional bullshit with it’s whack-job holdings, capped off with completely knitting out of whole cloth Article 2 immunity. So, ya. Reap what you sow.
When will these clowns start being arrested?
What? What? Is there not one grownup or responsible human in this whole sorry despicable regime?
nope! who could have predicted eh
“Gravitas”
Communicating with precision is imperative, which is why he specifies he’s talking about “law courts” here.
In case anyone was thinking food courts.
Haha!
Tennis courts, basketball courts, cut-de-sac courts, the mineral quartz…
tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwik...
Korts, the seldomly seen kilt/shorts-combo?
Guess he wants to make sure we all know he's not referring to tennis or basketball courts.
I love how he says the Supreme Court has no understanding of the law, but also thinks rights are "allocated" by the government and not unalienable to everybody by simply existing, as spelled out in the Declaration and Constitution
Precisely. The Declaration of Independence states that rights came from "the creator," not governments
He failed Constitutional Law.
Trump isn't a ruler or individual of virtue though. They talk a him like he's a king and as if that's a good thing.
No kings in America.
OMFL! 🤦
John Roberts engineered the current political situation.
The paragraph after the highlight is hystorical
I don’t think Roberts is going to take a 20-something online reactionary, who thinks Andrew Tate is a model of excellence and once wrote an article called “Free Nick Fuentes,” too seriously. Nor should he. But it’s pretty revealing about DHS, eh?
The crazy bit is that you don’t need a perfectly defined border or static permanent population to be a sovereign state. Plenty of states have border disputes and dynamic populations. We don’t say India and UAE aren’t states, after all.
You do need a functioning political system that has the capacity to enter relations with other countries, and there is an argument that Republicans are destroying that.
Well, he said the President is above the law. I'd say his understanding is suspect, wouldn't you?
“President Trump is the first leader who has actually meaningfully attempted to reverse this destructive trajectory, and done so with the gravitas of executive power”…and, there is the actual “audience of one” he is performing for
wow
What is this guy's definition of "Constitutional"? Also, isn't Roberts old enough to be this kid's grampa?
He can’t hear you - his ears are covered by Trump’s blubbery thighs.
Arguing that dispensing with the rule of law is restoring the rule of law. "Nations require borders" yeah we have borders.
The Atlantic has this guy pegged… Just a rightwing edgelord. Perfect.
Well done. (No, seriously, well done.)
"Allocate" rights? WTF? IANAL, but I thought rights were inalienable and endowed by our creator, not "allocated" by the government.
Apparently they never taught due process in Paul Ingrassia's law school.
Kinda makes you wonder what he read instead of the Constitution, doesn't it?
I like how he puts "RULE OF LAW" in all caps, as if that means fucking anything to Trump, who does not seek to "reestablish the RULE OF LAW" but, rather, to piss all over it.
He's free to join the dozens of cases the govt is defending in federal courts rn and make those arguments directly to the SCOTUS justices in person
Is it normal for the White House to assign “liaisons” to cabinet agencies? Seems kinda Soviet-style creepy.
The guy is a political officer — with a gun and orders to shoot anyone who doesn’t advance on the enemy (defined here as the American people). A/k/a, a commissar, or политический руководитель.
So disgusting.
"Years to come.." I'll guess 3.5 years, max.
They fully intend to make him a king “unitary executive” — like Putin and Xi. He craves it and so do they. Fools!
The crash out/cope on his post is crazyyyy, man sounds like he lost a local smash tournament, not like he’s a senior fawken liaison to a federal agency
More than that. The scumbag is saying that *generations* of judges have no idea how the law works, and that's why trump is going after universities. So according to these thugs, the only one who knows how the laws work is trump.
Ohhhh really. 🤨
it is obvious to us all that there are those in this administration that believe they alone can know and interpret the law. at least one who believes he alone is the messiah. Fit to lead? I think not.
“Donald Trump is restoring the proper rule of law moderated by individual responsibility and wisdom” is prima facie evidence for an involuntary commitment to a mental health institution
Paul Ingrassia sure walks and talks like a Nazi Sympathizer.
Just read thru this How many Double-Us in Twerp?
They are working so hard to shift the focus from the matter at issue - Did the federal government violate the constitution? - to irrelevant matters like border security or Mr. Garcia's possible crimes. The Court stayed focused on the issue in question: Did the feds follow the law? No. They did not.
So he is certain the immunity ruling was wrong and based on misunderstanding of the law and the US Constitution? I agree.
This is all you need to know about Paul Ingrassia bsky.app/profile/jeff...
Wow, could this guy be any more full of himself?
This guy’s LinkedIn shows that he was a law clerk in NY law firms for the two years after he graduated from law school, and it looks like he never passed the bar. Good to know that he has such well-formed opinions with such a prestigious background.
I’m sure Alina Habba, who has lost for him, has a muuuuuuch better understanding of the law 😂 😂 😂 😂
Paul Ingrassia is a kid. Gateway Pundit and Daily Caller short stints ... he is an intellectual lightweight, parroting talking points and edgy takes in an attempt to be relevant. Only in this halfass White House could he have any kind of agency to speak.
www.salon.com/2025/02/26/l...
I get the sentiment, but while he's inexperienced, he's an adult who should be considered one while looking at his actions. He has attended a Nick Fuentes rally, and pretended to be a lawyer before he even took the bar, "representing" the Tate brothers.
Just keep bringing it DHS!! You too DOJ! You want to keep going up against SCOTUS- bring it on!
Is he a rebranded skinhead infiltrator?
The word "border" appears zero times in the text of the constitution of the United States. constitution.congress.gov/constitution/
The word "citizenship" first appears in the 14th Amendment granting citizenship to all persons born in the United States who are subject to its laws.
The word "sovereignty" appears nowhere in the text of the constitution of the United States
The verb "allocate", as in "allocate rights", appears nowhere in the Constitution of the United States
The Constitution is very clear that rights are, in no way, "allocated" by the government.
The Declaration of Independence is abundantly clear on that question.
Rookie mistake. This rookie happens to be an ideologue.
They're already not obeying court orders regarding immigration; this is telling us that they are never going to regarding anything.
the fascism just drips from all of that screed
There is the law that is predicated on the Constitution and, on the other hand, the law that is predicated on the predilections of the tyrant, which are anti-constitutional. The White House liaison must be thinking about the second one. Soooo…SCOTUS, don’t be deterred. Do your job!!!
Kind of an embarrassment for Cornell. I’m honestly surprised he’s not a Yale graduate.
Big mad that Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and ACB didn’t bail Trump out. Have they ever even said “thank you” for their SCOTUS appointments?
Oof
Who is this nut job?😲
Methinks somebody brushed off an old English 101 persuasive argument paper
*ponders* My persuasive paper was against teaching "Intelligent Design" in public schools. That was like 16 years ago... haven't heard much about that group lately. /I got an "A" Phi Theta Kappa 4 lyf!!
Speaking of ‘deference’ right?
". . . , including 3 appointed by President Trump in his last administration no less." This is mob boss talk. "I appointed you, and *this* is how you repay me?"
Have Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and ACB even said THANK YOU to Trump for their appointments? Apparently not often enough, LOL.
Not only that, but they are all wearing robes! How disrespectful!
Tho TBF, it WAS at 1 a.m. on a Saturday. 😉
Lol
What they are saying is that only Stephen Miller understands the law because they're the laws he made up in his psychotic head where all the voices tell him that he must be an actual lawyer.
I momentarily forgot that this was written by a Trump flunky and was agreeing to the point of there being a cancer in the "conservative" legal establishment, re: the Federalist Society and their twisting of the law through originalism. The last paragraph, however, snapped me back to reality.
Remember- every accusation is a confession.
BwaHaHaHa
Mr. Ingrassia thinks good governance and borders allow for the “allocation” of rights. This flies in the face of 300 years of enlightenment thinking. Our natural rights exist above and outside any government. “ALL men are endowed by their creator with inalienable rights.”
Sadly, he's correct.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 Oh, wait - you were serious. My bad.
He is! Unless he is first chopped to pieces by a mob wielding garden hoes. In which case, he is not. But that’s just how law works.
Oh, hey, fuck you.
It's weird that we think of ourselves as developed but have reverted to talk of plagues and infections and parasites. What's next - I saw Justice Roberts communing with the Devil?
So maga paul is basically saying that felon don fucked up again because he appointed three of the conservatives on the court. The MF just can’t do anything right!
I guess if you’re calling your own SCOTUS appointees “parasitical” you’re not expecting to directly change their minds anymore.
Posting through it
The only way Trump would have gravitas would be if it were a new car model (with actual gold trim) from Mercedes-Maybach.
Maybe it was a typo? They meant "gravity".
I'm pretty sure they did mean gravitas, exactly the "serious" kind of word that someone with the sound judgment of a windshield wiper would apply to Donald Trump. www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/g...
To paraphrase Marshall "Bert and I" Dodge, I could take a sharp knife and a piece of knotty pine and whittle a person with more gravitas.
Or gravy.
Pretty sure both heads are empty.
They come up to me -- big, strong guys with tears in their eyes -- and they say, "sir, gravy is usually taken internally."
The container, no matter the flash, will still be filled with shit
Thesaurus in hand
Your monopoly board analogy was perfect.
The man lecturing the Justices graduated law school in 2022, had a cup of coffee at Kasowitz, and then wrote for the Gateway Pundit. 👌
Saying Andrew Tate exemplifies the “ancient ideal” of excellence is like saying that Sean Hannity demonstrates the oratorical gifts of Demosthenes.
While QTing someone calling himself "johnny maga" wtf
Also completely insane that he’s a government official now but he still has the gateway pundit affiliate icon on his twitter profile
Reading between the lines of his LinkedIn profile (i.e., was a "law clerk" at various firms for a year and a half after graduating), I'm guessing he's a chronic bar-exam failer.
Can’t a guy walk [do fascism at Gateway Pundit] and chew gum [do fascism at the WH] at the same time?
I'm just here for President Trump's deep appreciation for the virtues of responsibility and wisdom. 👊🇺🇸🔥
Snort-laugh
😀🤣
Better get comfy, you’re in for a long stay😅🤷🏻♀️
Those emojis! 😮
That’s not “gravitas”, that’s just “bulk”.
HE"LL YEAH BORTHER!!!!!!!111 👊 🇺🇸 🔥
Mastery!
What deep understanding of what?
Omg. As if.
@skyview.social unroll
And he wasn't actually licensed to practice law while at Kasowitz. www.mediaite.com/lawcrime/whi...
Photo looks just like a Tate
I was scrolling along and only realized it wasn't Tate when I saw your comment.
It is Tate. It's not a photo of the Trump guy. The article is about claims he made while his firm was representing Tate.
"Cup of coffee" was very apt!
Graduated from Cornell and his resume is this convoluted mess I mean...
How does one get this pompous AND this nuts at such a young age?
And clearly dozed through much of Con Law.
No, he stayed awake. He was looking for loopholes.
I was gonna say .... kid looks like he's 22
Is he wearing that bow tie of his own volition?
Yep. Paul Ingrassia President Trump's White House Liaison for DHS Graduated Cornell Law, 2022. Maybe 30 years old?
When you only have one trick
I mean, I have definitely posted through it at John Roberts
😂
What part of “co-equal” do they not understand?
Funny! Must be so proud!
The WH is very… cunning…uuhhh…ignorant
John Roberts [feverishly masturbating to images of Richard Nixon expanding executive powers]: "I don't care."
Based on the decisions he’s made over the past 20 years, I’d have to agree.
They teach you in law school to use “ALL CAPS,” to make your best points.
🤭
So….trump put three people on the Court that don’t understand the rule of law?