JD... What a tool.
JD... What a tool.
Why doesn't JD go & ask Murdoch himself? He flew to pay him & his son a visit just over a week ago... Not passing the smell test, JD! apnews.com/article/jd-v...
His character is going to be assassinated the same way I assassinated Sasquatch.
Assassinate his character? How? Getting a necromancer to bring it back to life and then kill it?
That explains why the yale law program has consistently produced the worst and dumbest bar members in 1000 years of legal history.
Umm, question? He's using AI to write these now isn't he? The second paragraph has the same sentence twice in a row. And what's with the dashes? That's a grammar bot thing. Or just someone sounding pretentious.
smol bean fascism
Is there where we point and laugh at YLS?
Always a local angle.
"We all know what's going to happen" Seems like ol' JD is hedging his bets a little here
The president has no character.
Vance doing an interpretation of his own poem, A Portrait in Hypocrisy.
Are you talking about unfounded accusations and made up stories and media propaganda? Sorry I was talking about your bullshit campaign attacking Biden and claiming he wasn't capable to lead. Dude you can't even speak to people like a normal human being, have you learned how to buy donuts yet?
That's so funny because I remember in grad school Yale Law students telling me that Yale Law was 'easy.' I was like 'oh but my life is so easy compared to yours--you're law students!' And they said 'nah, Yale Law is easy.' I still don't believe them but maybe they were telling the truth?
They were absolutely telling the truth. Same with Harvard Law, though it’s a bit harder. I’m saying this as someone whose dad and bf’s dad both went, and have said there were some DUMMIES there.
My observation is that Harvard Law is way harder. There probably are some dummies there because there are dummies everywhere but Yale is chill and Harvard is a grind.
Imo it’s much harder to get into Yale Law, but yes, Harvard is harder once you get in.
They were absolutely telling the truth
This lowlife is just a heartbeat away from the presidency. Gah!
Well, sure, but look at whose heartbeat that is …
he's the president's attack brat
Plot twist: JD is WSJ’s source to become POTUS.
Because the president regularly sues the parties who disagree with him?
As a Yale grad (not in law), I'm embarrassed. It's like he treats the law as a painter might, where the law is the negative space into which he must not venture, & so the positive space is filled up by BS that explicitly ignores the law. You can tell where the law is by the shape of its absence.
Vance: please please please show us the letter!!! It’s for Trump, I SWEAR.
The great writ of “but you didn’t show us the letter 😢 😢 😢!!!!”
The WSJ better drop more stuff before he releases Maxwell and provides a private jet to return her to her home. He will do it while he is in Scotland and hope everyone has forgotten it by the time he returns to the White House.
This coming from the admin that won’t show us the evidence. Talk about projection
"Get ready to learn discovery buddy" WSJ legal team to Trump legal team
We need to help jealous people get dates! They could kill us! They need money for dates!
We need to help jealous people get dates!!!!!!!!! We need to help jealous people get dates!!!!!!!!! We need to help jealous people get dates!!!!!!!!! We need to help jealous people get dates!!!!!!!!! We need to help jealous people get dates!!!!!!!!!
News corp not handing over physical evidence to involved party on demand? Equal in absurdity to the President of the United States writing poems to the most famous pedophile the world over, on demand.
Now that the WSJ has released Clinton's letter is it still fake?
Doesn't POTUS have access to everything in the possession of the Department of Justice?
One would need to have character in order to assassinate it.
This is the same guy who was accusing the entire Haitian community of eating cats and dogs without showing a shred of evidence and later admitted that he made that story up. Go snuggle with a couch, JD.
Hey, @jd-vance-1.bsky.social, you need not worry about the MSM assassinating Trump's character. It is already dead and rotted away a long time ago (even before the "grab 'em by the ..." interview). In 2016, you knew this. Somehow, in 2024, you threw your lot in with him, which is what I find absurd.
“WSJ won’t show us” while at the same time they are hiding the Epstein Files. Does maga see the hypocrisy? Does maga see the coverup or are the distractions working? Is maga falling for the new narrative that Maxwell is a victim so she’ll get out of jail soon?
This Vance fellow is a—how do you say it—whiny little bitch.
Ah, yes, the super PAC owned by Rupert Murdoch, who is famously pro-Democrat and anti-Republican.
Great JD let's move onto discovery shall we???
Maybe WSJ saw but does not have the letter. The basis for the article is at least a letter seen by WSJ, a generally conservative paper. Did Vance ever practice law?
Can this administration show us anything to back up any claim they've ever made? Even one time? Sit the fuck down, J.D.
tRump has already shown us who he is and what his "character" really is. He doesn't need help from anyone, we know. And we have known for a long time.
"I have no idea if it's true or not but it's definitely defamation" is quite a take
Discovery. Rupert is licking his chops. 🍿
Every story out of YLS is indistinguishable from a cult. It’s Tiger Cubs the whole way down
It’s adorable that he’s like “well show us the book!”, as if that would change his mind.
And the Wall Street Journal says “thank you“
James Donald Bowman is such a pathological liar that he can't even state his own name correctly on a public record. Location of the original is known. He just wants to pretend it isn't so that it can be buried, and then try to claim victimhood of that intentional obfuscation.
His premise is character assassination? That would require one to have character.
JD keeps advocating for the release of the letter that will collapse Trump’s career… I wonder what he is after.
Two semesters of financial crimes and four semesters of war crimes
-when pictures of the book come out, MAGA will say it’s fake news… - when the physical book is released, Maga will say it was written by Democrats. -when victims and other people involved testify to the reality of the book… Maga will say they’re all “in on it“ It’s. A. Fucking. Cult.
All true. But they will also keep asking: Why are Bill and Hillary Clinton not in jail yet? Where are the files???
They are "shitting their pants" over the birthday book---and whatever else WSJ has---remember JD you are talking about Rupert F'ing Murdoch!!
seriously how much Schmitt is in the curriculum over there
JD doesn't know what a SuperPAC is
Meanwhile who has forgotten Vances "they're eating the dogs and cat" blitzkrieg world tour
“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell” JD is pounding and yelling like hell.
Fuck that jerk off.
This reminds me of when Lenny Dykstra tried to sue a teammate for defamation and the judge came back and said it was basically impossible for someone to libel Dykstra bc he was such a scumbag of a person already. Trump is that scumbag too. www.nbcsports.com/mlb/news/jud...
Oh my! I think the same would apply to Trump. “this Court finds that, as a matter of law, the reference cannot “induce an evil opinion of [Dykstra] in the minds of right-thinking persons” or “deprive him of their friendly intercourse in society,” as that “evil opinion” has long existed.”
Never knew about this. What a legacy.
Very good baseball player, while also being a dirtbag of a person.
“Assassinate the presidents character” - ??? What character? Any character he had has been dead for a loooooong time.
They’re just mad the republican playbook is being used against them
JD still thinks that Trump has character. Bless his heart.
No. It's interesting how almost everything he says is a lie as if he can't tell the truth but he's a bad liar. This sounds like a guy who is obviously cheating on his wife. Also, it's deniable later so post-Trump he can CLAIM 'I never knew the president was a pedophile! But asked for evidence!'
He thinks they get to ok what the press write. Idiot.
Why aren’t they bringing the book to show us so we can shoot the guy who broke the Stormy Daniels story and continently burn I mean lose the evidence
Trump assassinated he own "character" long ago. Funny that the VP thinks he still has some.
Why bother when the real goal of attending YLS is access to previous alumni?
Would love to see law schools brag not about how many judges they’ve taught but how few Twitter trolls
“USND Hoople: celebrating 65 years of zero baseless defamation suits by our graduates”
"us"?
Been confused about this framing since he started talking to. Trump barely even knows JD why does he keep acting like “us” is a thing?
Also wild that JD is saying “I have no idea if this letter exists” when his boss is saying it doesn’t and is suing the publisher of the claim for $10 billion on the premise that the letter DOESN’T exist. Why would JD say anything other than that the letter for sure doesn’t exist? 🤔
Um, the naked lady picture? That weird bit of screenplay was supposed to be a poem?
I do wish they had just released the image of the letter. Too much vacuum in its absence.
It was shown on MSNBC. Possibly on Lawrence O’Donnell but i’m not sure. I remember seeing it. It was no big deal. Exactly as described. Trump just doesn’t know when to shut up.
Dragging it out means it does more damage.
As an alleged couch fucker, I don’t think his opinion on *checks notes* pedophilia is relevant.
They’re furious that their playbook is being used against them
Why would they show the letter? If they don't, then they get gold like this to refer back to and say "look how stupid this dumbass JD Vance is" when it is revealed. Then they get to run Trump's face in it after he spouts more lies. Then in discovery they get to find emails & texts trying to hide it.
dude’s got no juice. absolutely zero juice.
Vance did not show us the couch without stains.
So Vance is saying that the letter must exist, but will not be published until WSJ makes some real money off it first. Sounds like good business on the part of WSJ if you ask me..