Totally normal behavior that a 17 year old kid cosplaying as someone being a “protector” with no training, drives from one state to another picks up an AR then resorts to deadly force when confronted. Sounds reasonable.
Totally normal behavior that a 17 year old kid cosplaying as someone being a “protector” with no training, drives from one state to another picks up an AR then resorts to deadly force when confronted. Sounds reasonable.
You're conveniently ignoring the context of the "confrontation." Considering Kyle was en route to extinguish a car fire at the time, how are you justifying the unprovoked attack on Kyle by Rosenbaum?
Regardless of verdict or what he testified, no 17 year old kid has any business. I’ve got many years dealing with gun violence and a juvenile with no training or knowledge of use of or escalation of force should’ve been there. Two wrongs don’t make a right but he was wrong as was other aggressor .
Any business? 😂 Says who, you? 🤣😂 Despite YOUR ignorance, Kyle had every right to be there, armed, just like everyone else. Once YOU accept that reality is the moment YOU become less ignorant.
That didn't answer my question. Also, there was only 1 aggressor between Rittenhouse & Rosenbaum. The only aggressor was Rosenbaum. That fact was corroborated through video evidence & witness testimony.