socialist states do not typically come about through imperialism. there is a reason “dictatorship of the proletariat” is a known phrase
Replies
“what obligation or reason would a single uniform () power have to hand over power to the people”
aug 29, 2025, 8:34 pm • 0 0 • view
is there some reason you are removing the word “imperialist” that i typed to try to make a separate and incorrect point?
aug 29, 2025, 8:35 pm • 0 0 • view
Yes, I made a statement that it is similar to my criticism. You stated it cannot be similar because it Isn’t imperialism. So I quoted you to show what I meant about State Socialism not giving up power to the people to become Communism. Why would they?
aug 29, 2025, 8:38 pm • 0 0 • view
this is not hard but for some reason you have a very hard time understanding it. socialist states are formed by anti-imperialists. that is why they have incentive to provide power to people. because they are the people
aug 29, 2025, 8:40 pm • 0 0 • view
I think we are misunderstanding each other. Are you suggesting the Socialist States are actually Communism? (My point is they aren’t) Which gives real power to the people, the former or the latter? (Communism)
aug 29, 2025, 8:46 pm • 0 0 • view
i think you are a pedantic and tedious reply bot with no actual thoughts or beliefs, and you are only carrying on this conversation to quibble with no real point to make. if you would like to make one, feel free
aug 29, 2025, 8:47 pm • 0 0 • view
If the country you are in did something bad in the past, but they redistribute to all citizens to take care of needs, that is good, correct? We can criticize the past while applauding the present? There are no traditional Imperialist countries today. They are all neo- or never.
aug 29, 2025, 9:02 pm • 0 0 • view